LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K100978
    Device Name
    POWDER FREE NON-STERILE VINYL EXAMINATION GLOVE
    Manufacturer
    JIANGSU SUNSHINE PLASTIC PRODUCTS, CO. LTD
    Date Cleared
    2010-08-12

    (126 days)

    Product Code
    LYZ
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    General Hospital
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    K111598,K112741,K143277,K150934
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

    Device Description

    Powder-Free Non-Sterile Vinyl Examination Glove

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding "Powder-Free Non-Sterile Vinyl Examination Gloves." This document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria.

    The letter is an approval for marketing the device based on its substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. It confirms that the device falls under general controls and lists various regulatory requirements that the manufacturer must adhere to. The "Indications for Use" section briefly states the intended purpose of the glove.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided input:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not present. The document does not discuss performance metrics or acceptance criteria for the gloves.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not present. No test data or study details are provided.
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not present. No ground truth establishment is described.
    4. Adjudication method: Not present.
    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not present. This document does not pertain to AI or reader studies.
    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not present.
    7. The type of ground truth used: Not present.
    8. The sample size for the training set: Not present.
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not present.

    This document is purely an FDA clearance letter for a medical device, not a scientific study report or a detailed performance specification document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1