Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K971174
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1997-05-21

    (51 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.5470
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    PLAYTEX GENTLE GLIDE NATURAL ODOR ABSORBENT TAMPONS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Unscented menstrual tampons for the absorption of menstrual fluid.

    Device Description

    Unscented menstrual tampons for the absorption of menstrual fluid.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for Playtex Tampons, specifically addressing their substantial equivalence to previously cleared Playtex Gentle Glide Tampons. It does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the format requested.

    The document states:

    • Device Name: Playtex Tampons (Unscented Menstrual Tampons)
    • Predicate Device: Previously cleared Playtex Gentle Glide Tampons, Regular, Super and Super Plus.
    • Intended Use: Unscented menstrual tampons for the absorption of menstrual fluid.
    • Technological Characteristics: The new tampon has the same technological characteristics as the predicate device (fiber, string, materials in contact with the vaginal wall, and mode of action are the same).
    • Nonclinical Testing: Dioxin analysis, dermal irritation, acute oral toxicity, subacute vaginal irritations, agar diffusion, and TSST-1 toxin testing.
    • Conclusion: The Playtex Tampons are substantially equivalent to the predicate device in terms of safety and effectiveness based on the review of the data.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or provide information for the specific points you requested, as the document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence rather than reporting on specific performance acceptance criteria from a study.

    The document indicates that the determination of safety and effectiveness was based on the nonclinical testing mentioned above and a comparison to the predicate device. It does not describe a clinical study with a test set, ground truth, or statistical analysis of performance metrics against predefined acceptance criteria for the new device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1