Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K020183
    Date Cleared
    2002-03-13

    (54 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3710
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Pisces Plus (DW286 C) alloy intended to be used for onlay, ¼ crows, telescope crowns, conus crowns, posts, short and long span bridges, PFM crowns.

    Device Description

    Pisces Plus (DW286 C) alloy

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text from the FDA 510(k) K020183 document for "Pisces Plus" does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria.

    This document is a marketing clearance letter, which means the FDA has determined the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices. This letter primarily focuses on:

    • Trade/Device Name: Pisces Plus
    • Regulation Number and Name: 872.3710, Base Metal Alloy
    • Regulatory Class: Class II
    • Product Code: EJH
    • Submission Date: January 15, 2002
    • Approval Date: March 13, 2002
    • Indications For Use: For onlay, ¼ crowns, telescope crowns, conus crowns, posts, short and long span bridges, PFM crowns.
    • General Controls: Mentions annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

    It does not include:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria or reported device performance.
    2. Details about a sample size for a test set, data provenance, or a study.
    3. Information on experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications.
    4. Adjudication methods.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results or effect sizes.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for a training set.
    9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

    This type of information, particularly detailed performance data and study design, would typically be found in the 510(k) submission document itself, which is often much more extensive and not usually fully included in the public clearance letter. The clearance letter confirms the substantial equivalence but does not elaborate on the specific testing performed to demonstrate that equivalence.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1