Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(283 days)
PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA PROCESSOR
The Packet Decoder Process (PDP) is indicated for use as a prescription software device to receive MDDS digital data packets and decode, collate and deliver data to a Class I, MDDS, Enterprise Service Bus according to a proprietary scheme defined by Zephyr Technology.
The Packet Decoder Process (PDP) receives digital data that is transmitted by BioHarness 3.0, K 1 1 3045 in a proprietary structure. PDP receives this complex array of packet coded data. A decoding scheme is used to decode data and organize for presentation and access by Class I MDDS devices. The Packet Decoder Process is manufactured by Zephyr Technology Corporation. This software is loaded and executed in an MDDS operating systems in an MDDS computer. This complex process is defined by a proprietary scheme: Zephyr's General Comms Link Specification.
The provided text describes the Packet Decoder Process (PDP) device and its intended use but does not contain a study demonstrating its performance against specific acceptance criteria. The document states that "A series of factory tests are conducted to verify the intended signals are accurate and can maintain calibration over its useful life," and that the device "has benefited from design, development, testing and production procedures that conform to Quality Systems." However, specific details of these tests, including acceptance criteria and results, are not provided in the given text.
Therefore, many sections of your request cannot be fulfilled due to the lack of detailed performance study information in the provided document.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Not provided in the document. The document mentions "factory tests" to verify intended signals are accurate and maintain calibration but does not specify the acceptance criteria or the results of these tests.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
Not provided in the document. The document refers to "a series of factory tests" but does not mention the sample size used, the specific data tested, or its provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
Not applicable/Not provided in the document. The device is a software for decoding digital data packets (Packet Decoder Process, PDP). Its function is to accurately decode and collate data according to a proprietary scheme. This type of device typically relies on factory testing against known inputs and expected outputs, rather than expert-established ground truth in the way medical image analysis or diagnostic AI systems might. The document does not mention any expert involvement in establishing ground truth for testing.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable/Not provided in the document. Given the nature of the device as a data decoder, an adjudication method (like 2+1, 3+1) used for interpreting ambiguous medical cases is not relevant or mentioned. Performance testing would likely involve comparing decoded data against pre-defined correct decodings.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
Not applicable/Not provided in the document. The PDP is a standalone software component for decoding digital data and delivering it to a Medical Device Data System (MDDS). It is not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool designed to improve human reader performance, so an MRMC study is not relevant.
6. Standalone Performance Study
The document implies that standalone testing was conducted as part of "factory tests" to verify accuracy and calibration. It states, "A series of factory tests are conducted to verify the intended signals are accurate and can maintain calibration over its useful life." However, no specific study details, metrics, or results are provided.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
Not explicitly stated, but inferred: For a data decoding device, the ground truth would typically be the correctly decoded data as defined by the "proprietary scheme: Zephyr's General Comms Link Specification." The "factory tests" would involve feeding known, pre-encoded data into the PDP and verifying that the output matches the expected decoded values according to the specification.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable/Not provided in the document. The PDP functions by executing programmed commands written in Java based on a defined proprietary scheme. It is not an AI/ML model that requires a "training set" in the conventional sense for learning patterns.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable/Not provided in the document. As stated above, this is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set. Its function is deterministic, based on a predefined decoding algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1