Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K994151
    Date Cleared
    2000-03-01

    (83 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4800
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    PERCUTX-INJECTION/ASPIRATION NEEDLE PROBES/DEVICES

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The PercuTx - Injection /Aspiration Needle device is indicated for use as an accessory for currently marketed endoscopes to provide for delivery of injectable materials into tissues during endoscopic procedures.

    As with currently marketed endoscopic injection needles, the PercuTx Endoscopic Injection needle device may be used in a variety of endoscopic procedures for the delivery of a variety of injectable materials which have received approval for use by the FDA. The type of material to be injected will be dependent on the nature of the endoscopic procedure, but such materials may include for example: delivery of collagen during cystoscopic procedures; delivery of sclerosing agents during esophagoscopic, and gastroscopic procedures; delivery of local anesthetics during cystoscopic or laryngoscopic procedures; or delivery of saline or contrast media during colonoscopic.

    Device Description

    PercuTxTM Injection/Aspiration Needle Probes with Control Handpiece

    AI/ML Overview

    It appears the provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called "PercuTxTM Injection/Aspiration Needle Probes with Control Handpiece". This type of document does not typically include detailed information about acceptance criteria, study designs, or performance metrics in the way a clinical study report or a premarket approval (PMA) application would.

    510(k) clearance is based on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to a legally marketed predicate device, not necessarily on new clinical performance data that would involve detailed acceptance criteria and studies as requested in the prompt. While some 510(k) submissions might include performance testing, the provided letter itself does not contain that information.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information based on the given text. The text only states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices and provides its intended use.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1