Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K030218
    Device Name
    PER, MODEL MEMO
    Date Cleared
    2003-06-23

    (153 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2920
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    PER, MODEL MEMO

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The PER is indicated for use by patients as directed by a physician, who experience transient symptoms that may suggest cardiac arrhythmia, conduction abnormalities or other rhythm disturbances that may result in shortness of breath, pre-syncope or palpitations.

    Device Description

    The PER is a battery operated transtelephonic ECG event recorder and transmitter that is capable of storing multiple electrocardiograms and the transmission of these recordings by telephone to a receiving system. The PER stores the ECG before and after the `record' button is depressed. The recording period is preset up to 80 seconds with 2 recordings stored. The stored ECGs are transmitted by acoustic output by coupling the telephone mouthpiece over the PER

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for a transtelephonic ECG event recorder (PER). It focuses on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, KING OF HEARTS® EXPRESS (K920984), rather than a detailed performance study with specific acceptance criteria that would include metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy derived from a test set and ground truth.

    The document mentions:

    • Comparison of Electrical Characteristics and Data Transmission: This indicates a comparison was done to show the PER's performance in these areas was equivalent or better than the predicate. However, it does not provide specific acceptance criteria or results in a table format.
    • Summary of Safety: This references compliance with various safety and EMC standards (e.g., IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, AAMI EC11:1991). This confirms the device meets these standards, but these are general safety and performance standards for the device type, not specific acceptance criteria for a clinical study validating diagnostic accuracy.
    • Risk Analysis: Discusses failure modes and mitigation, but not performance against clinical acceptance criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table, sample sizes for test/training sets, details about expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or how training ground truth was established, as this information is not present in the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1