Search Results

These instruments have been designed to be used with an Olympus Light Source, Documentation Equipment, Display Monitor, Suction Pump, Endo-Therapy Accessories, elecrosurgical Unit, and other ancillary equipment for endoscopic diagnosis and treatment within the bladder, urethra, and kidneys.

Do not use this instrument for any purpose other than its intended use.

The Olympus XCYF-1T3 OES CYSTOFIBERSCOPE/NEPHROFIBERSCOPE has been specifically designed to be used with an Olympus Light Source, documentation, equipment, and display monitor. The XCYF-1T3 is equipped with a large Instrument Channel of bright optical quality compared to the predicate device, XCYF-1T3. These characteristics facilitate operation under endoscopic-surgery including high-frequency treatment within the bladder, urethra and kidnev.

This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (Olympus XCYF-1T3 OES Cystofiberscope/Nephrofiberscope) and does not contain the detailed information required to fill out a table of acceptance criteria, reported device performance, or specific study details often found in clinical trial reports or validation studies.

Here's why and what information can be extracted:

• 510(k) Purpose: A 510(k) submission primarily aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This typically involves showing that the new device has the same intended use, similar technological characteristics, and that any differences do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. It's not a direct submission of clinical trial results proving specific performance metrics against an acceptance criterion in the same way a PMA (Premarket Approval) or a clinical study report would.

Therefore, most of the requested information regarding detailed acceptance criteria, study specifics, and performance metrics is not available in this document.

However, I can extract and state what is present:

Key Information from the Document:

• Device Name: Olympus XCYF-1T3 OES Cystofiberscope/Nephrofiberscope, accessories and ancillary equipment.
• Intended Use: Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment within the bladder, urethra, and kidneys, to be used with an Olympus Light Source, Documentation Equipment, Display Monitor, Suction Pump, Endo-Therapy Accessories, electrosurgical Unit, and other ancillary equipment.
• Predicate Devices: K843084 Olympus Nephroscope/Cystoscope and K904940 Infant Resectoscope & Accessories.
• Safety Standards: The device is manufactured and tested according to voluntary safety standards IEC60601-1 and IEC60601-2-18.

Why specific details are missing:

• Acceptance Criteria & Reported Performance: The document states that the new device has a "large Instrument Channel of bright optical quality compared to the predicate device, XCYF-1T3" and "facilitate operation under endoscopic-surgery including high-frequency treatment." However, it does not provide quantitative acceptance criteria (e.g., "optical clarity must be >X lumens") or specific performance values (e.g., "achieved Y lumens"). The comparison to the predicate device is implicit rather than a formal side-by-side performance table.
• Sample Size, Ground Truth, Experts, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone Study, Training Set, Training Ground Truth: These are all aspects associated with detailed performance evaluation studies, especially for AI/algorithm-driven devices or clinical trials. This document pertains to a medical device (fiber optic endoscope) and does not describe such studies. Its substantial equivalence argument relies on comparing the design and materials to a predicate, and adherence to performance standards, rather than complex clinical outcome studies for this classification of device at the 510(k) stage. The mention of "electrosurgical treatment" being a new feature compared to the predicate "Nephroscope/Cystoscope Model CHF-P10" is a key difference being addressed, and the safety standards (IEC60601-1 and IEC60601-2-18) likely cover the electrical safety aspects of such an addition.

Conclusion:

Based on the provided document, I cannot fill out the requested table or provide most of the study details because the document is a 510(k) premarket notification for an endoscope, not a clinical study report for an AI-driven device or one requiring extensive clinical performance data in this format. The acceptance is based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices and adherence to recognized safety standards.

Ask a specific question about this device