Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K971328
    Date Cleared
    1997-07-01

    (82 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.4650
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Olympus CD-6C-1 Coagulation Electrode has been designed to be used with the Olympus BF-240 Bronchovideoscopes for electrosurgical cauterization or hemostasis in upper airways and tracheobronchial tree.

    Device Description

    Olympus CD-6C-1 Coagulation Electrode.

    AI/ML Overview

    I apologize, but the provided text from the 510(k) summary for the Olympus CD-6C-1 Coagulation Electrode does not contain the information needed to answer your request about acceptance criteria and a study demonstrating device performance.

    The document is a 510(k) summary, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing a detailed study report of the device's technical performance against specific acceptance criteria.

    Here's what the document does provide:

    • Device Name: Olympus CD-6C-1 Coagulation Electrode
    • Intended Use: For electrosurgical cauterization or hemostasis in upper airways and tracheobronchial tree when used with the Olympus BF-240 Bronchovideoscopes.
    • Classification: Class II, Endoscopic Coagulation Electrode and Accessories (21 CFR 876.4300)
    • Predicate Devices: Olympus CD-1L/U Coagulation Electrode (Preamendment) and Olympus KD Series Sphinctertomes (K955247)
    • Regulatory Determination: Substantially Equivalent

    It does not include any sections describing:

    • Specific acceptance criteria for performance metrics (e.g., coagulation time, temperature thresholds, tissue effect size).
    • Details of a study conducted to test these criteria.
    • Sample sizes for test sets or training sets.
    • Data provenance, expert qualifications, or adjudication methods for ground truth because these are typically found in detailed performance studies, not in a 510(k) summary emphasizing substantial equivalence.
    • Any mention of AI, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request based on the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1