Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(27 days)
Oil for Embryo Culture is intended for use in assisted reproductive technology procedures as an overlay to cover small volumes of culture media during embryo and gamete manipulation.
Oil for Embryo Culture is a solution intended for use in assisted reproductive technology procedures as an overlay to cover small volumes of culture media during embryo and gamete manipulation.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the "Oil for Embryo Culture" device:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Support embryonic growth | Confirmed: Assayed by mouse embryo assay which "assures that the product will support embryonic growth." |
| Absence of toxic components | Confirmed: Assayed by mouse embryo assay which "assures...that no toxic components are present." |
| Sterility | Confirmed: Sterility testing is performed as a condition of release. |
| Endotoxin levels | Confirmed: Endotoxin testing is performed as a condition of release. |
| Meets "Notice of Final Rule, 63 FR 48428, Docket number 97N-0335" | Confirmed: "The conclusion from performance testing as well as a review of the historical information contained in professional literature shows that Oil for Embryo Culture is suitable for the intended use and meets the criteria outlined in the Notice of Final Rule, 63 FR 48428, Docket number 97N-0335." |
Critique: The information provided about "acceptance criteria" is somewhat vague. It broadly states that the device must "support embryonic growth" and not contain "toxic components," and also meet specific regulatory requirements. The performance data section directly addresses these broad criteria.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated. The document mentions a "mouse embryo assay" but doesn't provide the number of mouse embryos or assays conducted.
- Data Provenance: The mouse embryo assay is a laboratory test, not human clinical data. The "historical information contained in professional literature" suggests a review of existing scientific knowledge, but no specific data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for that literature is given in relation to this specific device's performance testing.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:
Not applicable. The ground truth for this device is established primarily through direct laboratory assays (mouse embryo assay, endotoxin, sterility testing) rather than human expert interpretation of data from the device itself. The "review of the historical information contained in professional literature" would involve expert scientific review, but the document does not specify the number or qualifications of those experts for this submission.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
Not applicable. As the testing involves objective laboratory assays, an adjudication method for human interpretation is not relevant.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done:
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is typically used for diagnostic imaging or interpretation tasks where multiple human readers assess cases with and without AI assistance. The "Oil for Embryo Culture" is a laboratory consumable, not an AI-powered diagnostic device.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
Not applicable in the context of an AI algorithm. The device itself (the oil) is the "standalone" product being tested, and its performance is evaluated directly through biological and chemical assays.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
- Biological Response/Outcomes Data: The primary ground truth is derived from the biological outcome of the mouse embryo assay (ability to support embryonic growth, absence of toxic effects).
- Direct Measurement/Laboratory Standards: Sterility and endotoxin testing rely on established laboratory standards and direct measurements.
- Regulatory Compliance: The ultimate ground truth also involved meeting the criteria outlined in a specific regulatory notice (63 FR 48428, Docket number 97N-0335).
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
Not applicable. This device is not an AI algorithm, so there is no training set in the traditional machine learning sense. The "training" for the manufacturing process would be internal R&D and process validation, but this is not discussed as a "training set" for the device's performance evaluation.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:
Not applicable, as there is no training set for an AI algorithm. For the manufacturing process and quality control, ground truth would be established through established laboratory protocols, internal specifications, and compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1