Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(180 days)
NobelProcera HT ML Full Contour Zirconia Crown
NobelProcera HT ML FCZ Crown is indicated for use as core structure of an artificial prosthesis for partially edentulous patients in the need of prosthetic oral reconstruction in order to restore chewing function.
NobelProcera HT ML FCZ Crown is indicated for use as single crown that will be cemented to a natural or artificial tooth abutment.
NobelProcera® HT ML FCZ (High Translucent Multi Lavered Full Contour Zirconia) Crown is an individualized dental restoration made from translucent multi-layered zirconia material.
NobelProcera® HT ML FCZ Crown is intended to be a replacement for a natural tooth. After finalizing the NobelProcera® HT ML FCZ Crown in the dental laboratory, it is cemented or bonded onto a tooth or artificial abutment, by a clinician, to provide a natural tooth like appearance and to restore chewing functionality in the patient's mouth.
To achieve esthetics and required value and chroma of the surrounding natural teeth the NobelProcera® HT ML FCZ Crown is suitable for cut-back (veneering) or stain and glaze techniques.
The design of the NobelProcera® HT ML FCZ Crown is determined in a dental laboratory, hospital or dental practice by scanning, designing and ordering the crown using the NobelProcera® system (NobelDesign) or supported third party CAD systems. The crown, once ordered, is sent electronically to one of NobelProcera's centralized milling centers for fabrication.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental device, the "NobelProcera HT ML Full Contour Zirconia Crown." It details the device's description, indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices for substantial equivalence.
However, the document explicitly states: "No clinical or non-clinical test data was used to support the substantial equivalence determination."
Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance or information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria because such data is not present in the provided text. The FDA's substantial equivalence determination for this device was based on technological characteristics and comparison to already cleared predicate devices, rather than new performance testing.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1