Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(195 days)
Nerivio Migra
The Nerivio Migra is indicated for acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 18 years of age or older who do not have chronic migraine. It is a prescription use, selfadministered device for use in the home environment at the onset of migraine headache or aura.
The Nerivio Migra is a wearable, battery-powered device that is controlled by a mobile application. The system delivers low energy electrical pulses to the upper arm for 45 minutes per treatment, after which the device turns off automatically.
The device hardware consists of an armband intended to be worn on a user's upper arm. The armband contains the electronic circuitry and the battery in a plastic storage case as well as two electrodes that are attached to the interior of the armband and placed against the user's skin.
The device is operated and controlled via software that is installed and run on a user's personal mobile device such as a mobile phone or tablet. The device hardware communicates with the mobile application through a Bluetooth protocol. This mobile application software allows the user to control the stimulation intensity from 0 to 100% (representing intensity levels of 0-40mA), to start or stop the stimulation program, and to view device status such as the device's connection state, a progress bar for stimulation duration, battery level, and user notifications.
The patient is instructed to adjust the intensity to the strongest stimulation level below the perceived pain level. Treatments with Nerivio Migra are intended to be self-administered by the user immediately after the onset of migraine headache or aura.
The basic pulse structure is biphasic, with symmetrical interleaving phases and rectangular shape. The amplitude shift signal alternates between a nominal maximum and a nominal minimum of the amplitude signal. The maximal output current is 40mA. The assumed impedance is 1K ohm +/- 500 ohms.
The provided text describes the regulatory information, device description, non-clinical/bench studies, and clinical study details for the Nerivio Migra device. It does not contain information about a study that specifically proves the device meets acceptance criteria in the formal sense often used for AI/ML medical devices (e.g., target metrics for sensitivity, specificity, or similar performance measures).
Instead, the document details a clinical trial designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Nerivio Migra device for its intended use compared to a sham device. The "acceptance criteria" here are implicitly tied to the statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness of the primary and secondary endpoints in this clinical trial, as well as satisfactory results from non-clinical testing.
Based on the provided text, here's a breakdown of the information that aligns with your request, interpreting "acceptance criteria" as the successful demonstration of safety and effectiveness through the described clinical study and non-clinical testing:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Interpreted from Clinical Trial Endpoints and Non-Clinical Testing)
Acceptance Criteria (Implicit from Study Endpoints and Non-Clinical Success) | Reported Device Performance (Active Group vs. Sham/Control) |
---|---|
Non-Clinical Performance: Device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use (electrical stimulation characterization, impedance monitoring, electrode performance). | Met: "Results demonstrated that the system meets specifications." Electrode testing "passed all testing." |
Biocompatibility: Patient-contacting components are biocompatible. | Met: Evaluated per ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance; "All results demonstrated acceptable performance." |
EMC/Electrical Safety: Demonstrated electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety. | Met: Compliant with IEC 60601-1-2, AAMI/ANSI ES60601-1, IEC 60601-1-11, IEC 60601-2-10. |
Software Performance: Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis performed for "Moderate" level of concern. | Met: "Submission contained all elements…adequate documentation…verification and validation (V&V) testing…satisfactory results." |
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Percentage of participants reporting a reduction in pain level (severe/moderate to mild/no, or mild to no) within 2 hours of treatment (without rescue medication) is statistically significantly better than sham. | Met: Active: 66.7% (66/99) vs. Sham: 38.8% (40/103) in mITT set. Therapeutic gain 27.9%; p-value |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1