Search Results

The NxStage Dosing Calculator is intended to provide chronic hemodialysis prescription options with the NxStage System One and Cartridge with pre-attached dialyzer based on patient and treatment parameters. With a specified set of algorithms, it automatically performs calculations that are typically done by a physician or licensed healthcare practitioner. The algorithms used have been established and documented in scientific literature.

The NxStage Dosing Calculator is a software modeling program designed to assist physicians and licensed healthcare practitioners in prescribing chronic hemodialysis therapy with the NxStage System One and NxStage Cartridge with pre-attached dialyzer. It allows physicians and licensed healthcare practitioners to determine a range of appropriate treatment frequencies, treatment durations, and therapy fluid volumes. The program incorporates formulas that have been published in peer reviewed journals of medicine and models treatment parameters for a range of possible treatment frequencies, volumes, and durations. This is a tool only and does not replace the need for the physician or licensed healthcare practitioner to make an independent determination of the therapy best suited for the patient.

The provided text describes a software device called the "NxStage Dosing Calculator" but offers limited details about specific acceptance criteria or a detailed study proving its performance. The information focuses more on the regulatory submission process and the device's intended use and technological characteristics rather than a rigorous performance evaluation with quantitative metrics.

Here's an analysis based on the available text:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

Study Details

The text indicates that "Performance, verification and validation testing was conducted to characterize performance of the proposed device. This included testing for software readiness, software design review, and usability." However, it does not provide specific details about the methodology, sample sizes, or results of these tests beyond stating that "All predetermined acceptance criteria were met."

Therefore, many requested details cannot be extracted from the provided document.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified.
• Data Provenance: Not specified. It's likely that a "test set" in the traditional sense of clinical data might not have been used, as this is a Dosing Calculator (software) which performs calculations based on established algorithms. The testing likely focused on the accuracy of these calculations and the software's functionality and usability, rather than real-world patient outcomes.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Not specified. Given the nature of a dosing calculator based on published algorithms, the "ground truth" would likely be derived from the mathematical accuracy of the implemented formulas rather than expert consensus on individual cases.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not specified.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not applicable. This is a dosing calculator, not an AI for image interpretation or diagnosis requiring human reader comparison. The device is designed to assist physicians in calculations, not to be compared against human diagnostic performance or to augment human interpretation.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

• Yes, implicitly. The device itself is a standalone software that performs calculations. The testing mentioned ("software readiness, software design review, and usability") would inherently evaluate the algorithm's performance and the software's functionality without human intervention in the calculation process. Its output (prescription options) is then used by a human healthcare practitioner.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

• The "ground truth" for a dosing calculator is primarily the accuracy and correctness of the mathematical algorithms implemented, as established and documented in scientific literature. The device "automatically performs calculations that are typically done by a physician or licensed healthcare practitioner" using "algorithms that have been published in peer reviewed journals of medicine." Therefore, adherence to these established algorithms and correct computational output would constitute the ground truth.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable. This device is a rule-based system based on established algorithms, not a machine learning model that requires a "training set" in the typical sense.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable, as it is not a machine learning model requiring a training set. The algorithms themselves are the "ground truth" derived from scientific literature.

Ask a specific question about this device