Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K973218
    Device Name
    NIDEK HANDY
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1997-11-04

    (69 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    886.1120
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Nidek's HANDY NM-l00 is a hand-held non-mydriatic fundus camera which captures images of the retina electronically.

    Device Description

    Nidek's HANDY NM-l00 is a hand-held non-mydriatic fundus camera which captures images of the retina electronically.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Nidek Handy NM-100 Fundus Camera. It explicitly states that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it does not require new performance studies to prove safety and effectiveness.

    Therefore, this document does not contain information regarding acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, as a new study was not required.

    Specifically, the document does not include:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample size or data provenance for a test set.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method.
    5. Information on a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study or effect sizes.
    6. Information on standalone performance.
    7. The type of ground truth used (as no new performance study was conducted).
    8. Sample size for a training set.
    9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

    The FDA's determination of substantial equivalence (K973218) for the Nidek Handy NM-100 Fundus Camera is based on its similarity to existing devices, specifically stating: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976... "

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1