Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K130879
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2013-07-09

    (102 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5440
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    NEXUS IV TUBING SET WITH LUER-ACCESSBILE ONE-WAY CHECK VALVE - IV PLUS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The NIVTS-LACV (Nexus IV Tubing Sets with Luer-Accessible One-Way Check Valve) are intended to administer IV fluids/medication to the patient's vascular system through a needle-free device system that aids in the elimination of needle-stick injury.

    The Nexus Luer-Accessible One-Way Check Valve (LACV) is designed to allow fluid flow in one direction and stop or check fluid flow in the opposite direction.

    Device Description

    Nexus IV Tubing Sets with Luer-Accessible One-Way Check Valve

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but to answer your request, I need extensive details on "acceptance criteria" and "device performance" that are not present in the given text. The provided document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device (Nexus IV Tubing Sets with Luer-Accessible One-Way Check Valve). It confirms that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices.

    However, the document does NOT contain:

    • Specific acceptance criteria: It doesn't list quantitative or qualitative criteria that the device had to meet (e.g., "flow rate must be X mL/min with Y% accuracy" or "check valve must prevent backflow in Z% of trials").
    • Reported device performance data: It doesn't provide any tables or descriptions of how the device actually performed in any tests against such criteria.
    • Details of a study: There's no mention of a clinical or non-clinical study, its design, sample sizes, data provenance, ground truth establishment, or expert evaluations. The 510(k) clearance process primarily relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which sometimes involves performance testing against recognized standards, but the results of those tests are not typically included in the clearance letter itself.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for details about acceptance criteria and study data based on the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1