Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K173009
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2017-11-07

    (41 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5010
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    NCompass Nitinol Stone Extractors

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The NCompass Nitinol Stone Extractors are intended for extraction of stones or debris during biliary surgical procedures.

    Device Description

    The NCompass Nitinol Stone Extractor is a single-use, sterile, disposable device. The extractor is a stone retrieval device consisting of nitinol basket with a 1.5 cm wide diameter when fully expanded and a 2.4 Fr shaft diameter sheath. The device is packaged with a Touhy-Borst adapter accessory.

    AI/ML Overview

    The NCompass Nitinol Stone Extractors are intended for extraction of stones or debris during biliary surgical procedures.

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding acceptance criteria and the study:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    Test CategorySpecific TestAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    BiocompatibilityCytotoxicity, Sensitization, Intracutaneous Reactivity, Acute Systemic Toxicity, Material-Mediated PyrogenicityMaterials are biocompatible (per ISO 10993-1)All materials found to be biocompatible.
    Mechanical PropertiesDimensional and Compatibility EvaluationMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesRadiopacity EvaluationMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    PerformanceMultiple Stone Retrieval TestingMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesTensile Test: Basket FormationMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesTensile Test: Basket CoilMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesTensile Test: Basket SheathMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesTensile Test: Basket Sheath to Handle ConnectionMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesTensile Test: Basket Assembly to Shaft ConnectionMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.
    Mechanical PropertiesTensile Test: Cannula to Basket Coil ConnectionMet pre-determined acceptance criteriaAll pre-determined acceptance criteria were met.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

    The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for each of the listed tests. The provenance of the data (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is also not specified. These are typically details found in the full test reports, not a 510(k) summary.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications:

    This information is not provided in the document. The tests performed are primarily engineering and material science tests, not clinical studies requiring expert ground truth establishment in the traditional sense (e.g., for diagnostic accuracy).

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

    This information is not applicable/provided. The tests described are objective engineering and performance tests, not those that typically require adjudication by multiple experts.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done:

    No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence through non-clinical performance and material testing.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

    Not applicable. The device is a medical instrument (stone extractor), not an algorithm or AI system. Therefore, standalone algorithm performance is not relevant.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:

    For the tests described (biocompatibility, dimensional, radiopacity, mechanical, multiple stone retrieval), the "ground truth" would be established by:

    • Established standards and specifications: For biocompatibility, ISO 10993-1 is explicitly mentioned. For dimensional, tensile, and radiopacity tests, there would be internal design specifications and recognized test methods.
    • Physical measurements and objective observations: Test results are compared against predefined numerical or qualitative criteria.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:

    Not applicable. The device is a medical instrument, not an AI or machine learning model that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

    Not applicable. As above, there is no training set for this type of device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1