Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K131992
    Device Name
    MULTICHEM P
    Date Cleared
    2013-09-25

    (89 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MULTICHEM P

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Multichem P is intended for use as a single level assayed quality control material to monitor the precision of laboratory testing procedures for the analytes listed in the package insert.

    Device Description

    The Multichem P control is prepared from human serum to which purified biochemical material (extracts of human origin), chemicals, drugs/preservatives and stabilizers have been added. The control is used in liquid form for convenience. This control is provided in a single level control only with twelve vials, each vial containing 3 mL.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document describes the Multichem P device, which is a quality control material intended to monitor the precision of laboratory testing procedures for specific analytes. This is a Class I reserved product, meaning it is considered low risk and subject to general controls. The acceptance criteria and supporting study are primarily focused on demonstrating its performance as a stable and reliable control material.

    It's important to note that this is not an AI/ML powered device, nor is it a diagnostic device that requires human interpretation of outputs. Therefore, many of the typical criteria for AI/ML or diagnostic devices (like MRMC studies, expert adjudication for ground truth, standalone performance metrics like AUC, sensitivity, specificity, etc.) are not applicable here. The "device performance" in this context refers to the stability and reliability of the control material over time and across different testing systems.

    Here's a breakdown based on the provided text, addressing the requested information where applicable:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document doesn't explicitly list "acceptance criteria" in a quantitative performance table like for a diagnostic device. Instead, the acceptance criteria are embedded within the stability testing summary and the comparison to the predicate device. The performance is reported in terms of stability claims and value assignment.

    Acceptance Criterion (Implicit)Reported Device Performance
    Open Vial Stability- 14 days at 2 to 8°C.
    Shelf-Life Stability (Closed Vial)- Predicted to be stable for in excess of 30 months when stored at -20℃ to -80℃.
    Drift Limit (during stability testing)- 10% (This was the threshold used to determine stability for the shelf-life claim).
    Value Assignment Range Establishment- Pre-determined criteria of 20% (Likely referring to the acceptable deviation from the target value during initial value assignment to ensure the control works across different Abbott ARCHITECT c8000 systems).
    Substantial Equivalence to Predicate Device- Multichem P control claims substantial equivalence to Liquichek™ Immunology Control, sharing similar intended use, form (liquid, frozen), and matrix (human serum based). Differences exist in specific assayed analytes and opened/closed vial shelf-life durations, but overall functionality as a quality control is considered equivalent. This implies that the performance (stability, ability to monitor precision) is comparable to the legally marketed predicate.

    (Note: These criteria are inferred from the description of the performance studies rather than explicitly stated as pass/fail thresholds in a table.)

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size for Stability Testing (Test Set):
      • Accelerated Testing: Three lots of controls.
      • Real-time Testing: One lot of controls.
      • Initial Value Assignment: Not explicitly stated, but performed using "replicate analyses" for each specific lot. Given it's a quality control for monitoring precision, the "test set" would primarily refer to the samples used in stability studies.
    • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated regarding country of origin, but the submitter (Techno-path Manufacturing Ltd.) is based in Ireland. The testing was conducted "by the control manufacturer and/or by independent laboratories." The testing described is prospective in nature, as it involves initiating stability studies (accelerated and real-time) to generate data over time.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    • Not applicable / Not explicitly mentioned. As this is a quality control material, the "ground truth" for its performance is objective chemical stability and the ability to produce consistent results on analytical instruments, rather than a subjective interpretation by experts. "Value assignment" is based on instrumental readings and statistical methods.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • Not applicable. There is no expert adjudication process described or needed for a quality control material. The assessment is based on objective analytical data.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    • No, an MRMC study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic devices where human readers interpret results, and the AI's impact on human performance is being evaluated. Multichem P is a quality control material, not a diagnostic device with an interpretive output for human readers.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    • Yes, in essence, the "performance characteristics" section describes standalone performance. The device (Multichem P control) is itself the "algorithm" or material being tested. Its stability and performance are evaluated objectively on analytical systems (Abbott ARCHITECT c8000 Chemistry system) without human interpretive intervention beyond running the tests and analyzing the quantitative results. The data presented for stability is purely the performance of the control material.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    • The "ground truth" for this quality control material is its inherent chemical stability and the expected analyte concentration values as determined through analytical methods on specified laboratory instruments.
      • For Value Assignment, the "ground truth" is the statistically determined typical value and range for each analyte on the specified instrument, established by "replicate analyses."
      • For Stability Testing, the "ground truth" is the maintenance of these assigned values within predefined limits (e.g., 10% drift limit) over time and temperature conditions. This relies on objective quantitative measurements.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Not applicable in the conventional sense for an AI/ML device. This is a physical quality control material, not a software algorithm that undergoes machine learning. The term "training set" doesn't apply.
      • If interpreted as "data used to initially develop and optimize the control formulation," the text doesn't provide this detail. The document describes studies to validate the manufactured product's performance.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • Not applicable (as per point 8). There is no "training set" ground truth in the context of an AI/ML algorithm. The underlying principles for formulating such a control product would rely on established biochemical and analytical chemistry principles to ensure stability and appropriate analyte concentrations.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1