Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K963480
    Date Cleared
    1997-01-22

    (141 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    890.3910
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MULTI-PURPOSE UTILITY RESTRAINT/BODY HOLDER

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DeRoyal Industries, Inc. Multi-Purpose Utility Restraint/ Body Holder is indicated for use, at the discretion of a responsible licensed healthcare professional, to limit patient movements thereby enamination or protection of th patient or others. The Multi-Purpose Utility Restraint can be used with an OR table, gurney, bed, or stretcher. The Bod Holder is a protective restraint which can be used with a bed or wheelchair.

    Device Description

    The DeRoyal Industries, Inc. Multi-Purpose Utility Restraint / Body Holder is a protective restraint device that is intend medical purposes to limit patients thereby enabling examination or protection of the patient or others.

    Device Design/Materials Used/Physical Properties: The DeRoyal Multi-Purpose Utility Restraint/ Body Holde designed similar to those marketed by other manufacturers. The Multi-Purpose Utility Restraint Body Holder is prima - comprised of nylon or cotton.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) Summary for the DeRoyal Industries, Inc. Multi-Purpose Utility Restraint/Body Holder. It describes a medical device and its intended use, but it does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria.

    The purpose of a 510(k) Summary is to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, not to present performance data against specific acceptance criteria. The document lists characteristics of the device and compares them to "Other Devices" (predicate devices), noting they are "Same". This comparison implicitly serves as the "proof" for the 510(k) pathway – that because it is similar to already marketed devices, its safety and effectiveness are established.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from the given text. The input does not contain:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample size for test set or data provenance.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts.
    4. Adjudication method for the test set.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study or effect size.
    6. Standalone (algorithm only) performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1