Search Results

Multi-Cure composite cement is used as a luting cement for veneers, crowns, and bridges for anterior and posterior teeth. Composite restorative materials were developed by Dr. Raphael Bowen working for American Dental Research. The main innovation was Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate (Bis-GMA), a dimethacrylate resin with silane coated filler (quartz) particles. These coated particles could bond chemically to the Bis-GMA resin. This is recommended for use for Classes III to V and for Class I when oclusal stress is not a problem and appearance is crucial. Although less durable than amalgam composite designed for Class II posterior applications, it is now used in about 20% of these restorations also.

Multi-Cure Composite Cement. The base paste and catalyst paste when mixed together form an exothermic reaction. When a standard dental curing light in the visible wave-length range is used it will cause the camphorquinone and the liquid "A" dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate to accelerate this reaction.

The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a dental composite cement. It does not include information about acceptance criteria for a device's performance, nor does it describe a study proving the device meets any such criteria.

The document is a regulatory approval, stating that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices. This means it met the administrative and safety/effectiveness requirements for its class, not that a specific performance study against defined acceptance criteria was conducted and reported here.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe acceptance criteria and a study from the provided text. The document simply isn't structured to provide that information for the following reasons:

1. No Acceptance Criteria or Reported Performance: The document does not contain any tables of acceptance criteria or reported device performance metrics. It's a regulatory clearance letter, not a performance study report.
2. No Study Description: There is no mention of a specific study, sample sizes, data provenance, ground truth establishment, expert involvement, or any other details related to a performance study for the Multi-Cure Composite Cement.
3. No MRMC or Standalone Studies: Since no study is described, there's no mention of MRMC comparative effectiveness studies or standalone algorithm performance.
4. No Training Set Information: Similarly, there is no information about a training set or how ground truth for a training set was established, as this would pertain to a performance study or algorithm development, neither of which is detailed here.

In summary, the provided document is a regulatory approval for a dental composite cement based on substantial equivalence, not a report detailing performance study results against acceptance criteria.

Ask a specific question about this device