Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K073218
    Date Cleared
    2008-01-07

    (53 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3820
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MTA ADVANCED MATERIAL

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    MTA ADVANCED MATERIAL is indicated for use in dental procedures that contact the pulp, dentin, or periradicular tissues:

    • . Repairing the periradicular tissues in procedures such as root-end filling, repair of internal or external root resorption, iatrogenic perforation repair, apexification, pulpectomy, or
    • . For protecting injured pulps, pulp-capping, pulpotomies, or cavity liner
    Device Description

    MTA ADVANCED MATERIAL a powder and liquid root canal treatment system. The combination of the powder and liquid creates a colloidal gel that solidifies to form a strong impermeable barrier to seal off pathways of communication between the root canal system and external surfaces of the tooth.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text from the 510(k) summary (K073218) for "MTA ADVANCED MATERIAL" does not contain the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the format you've requested.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for a dental root canal filling resin. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on:

    • Device Description: What the product is and what it does.
    • Intended Use: The clinical applications of the device.
    • Technological Characteristics: Highlighting that its components are legally marketed and safe for dental use.
    • Biocompatibility Testing: Mentioning that it passed tests for cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and sensitization.

    There is no mention of:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
    3. Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication methods.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness studies.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for a training set.
    9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

    This type of information is typically found in performance studies or clinical trials, which are not detailed in this 510(k) summary. The document focuses on the regulatory approval process rather than a detailed performance study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1