Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K993682
    Date Cleared
    2000-01-20

    (80 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1000
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The MRI Equipment Cover is intended to provide a sterile, disposable covering of the MRI instrumentation during surgical procedures conducted under Magnetic Resonance Imaging (“MRI”).

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This looks like a 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device. The document explicitly states that the device is an "MRI EQUIPMENT COVER" and its intended use is to "provide a sterile, disposable covering of the MRI instrumentation during surgical procedures conducted under Magnetic Resonance Imaging ('MRI')."

    Because this is a Class II device and the clearance is based on substantial equivalence, the FDA does not require a clinical study proving efficacy against specific acceptance criteria in the same way a Class III device would. The focus is on demonstrating that the new device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed predicate device. Therefore, a study demonstrating specific acceptance criteria with performance metrics, ground truth, and expert evaluation is not provided in this document because it was not a requirement for this type of clearance.

    The clearance letter primarily confirms that the FDA has reviewed the submission and determined that the device is substantially equivalent to devices marketed prior to May 28, 1976. This usually means that the manufacturer provided comparisons to an existing predicate device regarding design, materials, sterilization methods (given it's a sterile cover), and intended use, rather than a clinical trial with performance endpoints.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the information requested in your bullet points from this document, as it pertains to a clinical efficacy study, which was not the basis for this 510(k) clearance.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1