Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K982048
    Date Cleared
    1998-07-27

    (47 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5025
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MPS RESERVOIR BAG

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The MPS Reservoir Bag is intended for use with Ambulatory PCA or APII 1. pumps for continuous infusion therapy. For use for infusion of I.V. fluids, and drugs. Refer to the directions for use of the infusion pump for compatible indications for use. For use up to 24 hours per CDC guidelines or per hospital protocol. For use with standard luer taper connections. For single patient use.

    Device Description

    Each MPS Reservoir Bag is sterilized in sealed individual pouches. Full labeling information is provided with each MPS Reservoir Bag. Multi-unit shelf packs of individual pouches or trays are provided for convenience.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "MPS Reservoir Bag." This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a study that establishes acceptance criteria and proves the device meets them through performance data.

    The document highlights:

    • Technological comparison to a predicate device: The MPS Reservoir Bag is compared to the "Baxter Drug Bag" in terms of materials, design, and intended use, asserting substantial equivalence. Minor differences in color coding and slide clamp attachment are noted.
    • Nonclinical test summary: Materials and bonding agents were tested per ISO 10993 for biocompatibility.

    Therefore, the information required to answer your request (acceptance criteria, device performance table, study details, human reader studies, ground truth establishment, training set details) is not present in the provided 510(k) summary. This type of submission typically relies on equivalence to a legally marketed device rather than extensive new clinical performance studies with defined acceptance criteria and performance metrics against human experts or pathology.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1