Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K012468
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2001-09-04

    (33 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MODIFICATION TO N/T PROTEIN CONTROL SL

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    N/T Protein Controls SL/L, M, and H are for use as accuracy and precision assayed controls in the determination of the following human serum proteins by immunonephelometry with BN™ Systems: IgG, IgG7, IgA, IgM, C3c, C4, Transferrin, in Innonophobionou y ma2-macroglobulin, Haptoglobin, α--acid glycoprotein, Prealbumin, Albumin, c.y antill Jpon) @2 maor J.g/L-chain lambda & kappa, β2-microglobulin, soluble Transferrin Receptor (STFR), Ferritin, IgE, and Total protein; and by immunoturbidimetry with the TurbiTimeSystem: IgG, IgA, IgM, C3c, C4, Transferrin, Albumin, Haptoglobin, α4acid glycoprotein.

    Device Description

    N/T Protein Control SL is a liquid control prepared from human serum with sfabilizers and preservative. It is intended to be used as an accuracy and precision control for the presentation of human serum proteins by immunonephelometry with BN™ Systems and by immunoturbidimetry with the TurbiTimeSystem.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text, outlining the acceptance criteria and the study details for the N/T Protein Control SL device:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Stability (unopened)At least 14 days at +2° to +8° C, as originally packaged
    Stability (opened)At least 14 days at +2° to +8° C, once opened

    Note: The document primarily focuses on stability as the performance characteristic. It doesn't explicitly state quantitative acceptance limits for accuracy or precision, but rather implies they are met based on the "substantially equivalent" claim to a predicate device.


    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The provided document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the test set. It mentions "Dade Behring protocols" for stability evaluation but gives no details about the number of samples or runs.

    The data provenance is not specified in terms of country of origin. The study appears to be prospective in nature, as it describes evaluations performed to support the 510(k) submission for this specific device.


    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not provided in the document. The device is a quality control material and its performance evaluation for stability would not typically involve expert ground truth in the same way a diagnostic imaging device would. The "ground truth" here would be the measured analyte concentrations and their stability over time, determined by the instrument itself.


    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not provided and is not applicable for this type of device and study. Adjudication methods are typically used to resolve discrepancies in expert interpretations (e.g., in clinical trials or diagnostic studies), which is not relevant for evaluating the stability of a control material.


    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance

    A Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic devices that involve human interpretation, often assisted by AI. The N/T Protein Control SL is a quality control material, not a diagnostic device requiring human reader interpretation or AI assistance.


    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    A standalone performance study was not applicable/not done in the context of an algorithm. This device is a chemical control material for laboratory instruments, not an AI algorithm. Its "performance" refers to its chemical and physical stability and its ability to produce consistent results on specified analytical systems.


    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    For this device (a quality control material), the "ground truth" for the performance evaluation (stability) is established through instrument measurements of known analyte concentrations at different time points and under different conditions. The "accuracy" and "precision" mentioned in the intended use refer to the device's ability to verify the accuracy and precision of an analytical system using its known analyte values. The stability study aims to ensure these known values remain constant over time.


    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    The concept of a "training set" is not applicable here. This device is a control material, not an algorithm that requires training data.


    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Since there is no "training set" for this device, this question is not applicable.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1