Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K051756
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2005-07-27

    (28 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MODIFICATION TO:TRABECULAR METAL FEMORAL CONE AUGMENTS, MODELS 03-125-ZZZZ

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments are indicated for use in the reconstruction of bony defects in knee reconstruction due to severe degeneration, trauma, or other pathology of the knee joint, and in the revision or salvage of failed, previously reconstructed knee procedures and implants. The Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments are for cemented use only in the USA, and for cementless or cemented use outside the USA.

    Device Description

    The Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments are to be used in conjunction with Zimmer Inc.'s LCCK and Rotating Hinge Knee femoral components. The subject devices are used to fill femoral cavitary defects encountered when implanting either of these two systems. The design of the augment interface inversely corresponds to the design of an LCCK or Rotating Hinge Knee femoral component. The augment has a rectangular, tapered shape. The opposing sides of the rectangle are longer than the center allowing the sides of the augment to fit into the condyles of the femoral component. The center of the augment is hollow to allow passage of the stem through the center of the cone and into the femoral canal. The augments are fixed to the femoral component with bone cement. The Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments are for cemented use along the bone in the USA, and for cementless or cemented use along the bone outside the USA.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Zimmer Trabecular Metal Femoral Cone Augments. It explicitly states that "Testing of the subject devices were not performed."

    Therefore, it is impossible to describe acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them from the given document. The submission relies on a comparison to predicate devices and previous testing of the Trabecular Metal material itself to establish substantial equivalence, rather than new performance testing of the augments.

    As a result, I cannot provide the requested information, including tables of acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert details, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details, because these data were not included in the provided 510(k) submission.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1