Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K990220
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1999-03-31

    (68 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.1075
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MODIFICATION OF GIP/MEDI-GLOBE ULTRASOUND NEEDLE SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The GIP/ Medi-Globe Needle System for Ultrasonic FNA is specifically designed for ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of submucosal and extra-luminal lesions of the Gastrointestinal tract (i.e., pancreatic masses, mediastinal masses, peri-pancreatic masses, and lymph nodes).
    The Medi-Globe Needle System for Ultrasonic FNA is designed to be used with the Pentax FG32, 34, 36, 38 UA ultrasound endoscopes for ultrasonically guided fine needle aspiration (FNA of submucosal and extra-luminal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract (i.e., pancreatic masses, mediastinal masses, peri-pancreatic masses, and lymph nodes).

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the GIP/Medi-Globe Needle System for Ultrasonic FNA. It is a premarket notification for a medical device and, as such, does not contain the detailed information required to describe acceptance criteria and a study proving a device meets those criteria.

    510(k) submissions primarily focus on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing comprehensive efficacy studies that would include acceptance criteria, performance metrics, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or human reader studies.

    Therefore, none of the requested information can be extracted from the provided text, as it focuses on regulatory submission details and claims of substantial equivalence.

    Specifically, the document does not contain information related to:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes for a test set or data provenance.
    3. Number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications.
    4. Adjudication methods.
    5. Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies or effect sizes.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1