Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K960885
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-04-26

    (53 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.1320
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The e-Net serves two functions as a part of the Hydro Dot NeuroMonitoring System. First, it locates the EEG electrodes according the 10-20 International System. Secondly, it conducts the electrical signal sensed by the electrodes from the skin to the EEG equipment.
    Headpiece (42-48 cm) for EEG Monitoring

    Device Description

    The small e-Net is designed to fit patients with a head size in the range of 42 - 48 cm in circumference. It is constructed using the same materials and manufacturing processes as the larger sized net 54 - 62 cm) which is described in K930080. The e-Net serves two functions as a part of the Hydro Dot NeuroMonitoring System. First, it locates the EEG electrodes according the 10-20 International System. Secondly, it conducts the electrical signal sensed by the electrodes from the skin to the EEG equipment. The small e-Net is fabricated from the same materials as the larger version. Only the size of the components was reduced to achieve the proportional fir on the intended head sizes.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (Physiometrix, Inc.'s Small e-Net Model 1240). However, it does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.

    The document primarily focuses on:

    • Device Description: What the small e-Net is, its intended use (EEG monitoring for head sizes 42-48 cm), and its construction.
    • Regulatory Classification: Identifying it as a Class II cutaneous electrode and its predicate device.
    • FDA Substantially Equivalent Letter: This letter confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device, allowing it to be marketed. It also outlines general control provisions and regulatory responsibilities.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and study details based on the given input. The document is a regulatory approval notice, not a performance study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1