Search Results

The M.L.T. 30 CO2 laseris intended for the ablation, vaporization, incision, and or cutting of soft tissue in: Oral surgery, Dermatology, E.N.T., Gynaecology.

The Medical Laser Technologies Ltd. MLT 30 CO2 Laser emits a beam of coherent light at 10.6 microns.

The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the Medical Laser Technologies Ltd. MLT 30 CO2 Laser. This submission primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing detailed performance data from a new study.

Here's a breakdown based on your requested information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Sample size: Not applicable. No new test set data was generated or used as performance data was not required.
• Data provenance: Not applicable.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Not applicable. No new test set data was generated or used.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Not applicable. No new test set data was generated or used.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not applicable. This is a medical device (laser) and not an AI-based diagnostic tool. No MRMC study was conducted.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

• Not applicable. This is a medical device (laser) and not an AI-based algorithm. No standalone performance study was conducted.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

• Not applicable. The submission relies on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on new clinical performance data with ground truth.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable. This product is a conventional medical laser, not an AI or machine learning device requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable.

Summary of Device Acceptance:

The acceptance of the MLT 30 CO2 Laser was based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a previously legally marketed predicate device (Medical Laser Technology, Inc. M.L.T. 30 CO2 Laser). The key argument for acceptance was that the new device's specifications and indications for use are the same as or very similar to those of the predicate device. Therefore, no new performance data or clinical studies were conducted or required for this 510(k) submission.

Ask a specific question about this device