Search Results

Miltex Sterilization Cassettes (Miltex®, Thompson™) are general dental/surgical instrument cassettes indicated to hold instruments and accessories in place during storage and the sterilization cycle. Suitable for Gravity Steam and Pre-Vacuum Steam, the cassettes are intended to be used in conjunction with sterilization wrap in order to maintain sterility.

Miltex® Thompson™ Cassettes are sterilization cassettes made of surgical-grade passivated stainless steel to provide protection, storage and organization for all types of instruments. Miltex® Thompson™ Cassettes may be used in dental, surgical or veterinary procedures. Cassettes are available in a variety of configurations and are designed to fit standard autoclaves.

The provided text describes Miltex® Thompson™ Cassettes, which are sterilization cassettes used for dental/surgical instruments. The document focuses on their indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, instructions for use (cleaning and sterilization), and validated sterilization parameters. It also includes information about the product's 510(k) clearance (K101653) with the FDA.

Based on the provided information, here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document states: "Miltex® Thompson™ cassettes have been tested with no adverse effects under the following sterilization parameters." and "Miltex® Thompson™ cassettes have been validated to withstand up to 50 sterilization cycles with no evidence of deterioration."

• Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size (number of cassettes or tests) used for the sterilization and durability testing. It indicates that testing and validation were performed, but not the specific quantity of units involved.
• Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin where the testing was conducted. Given the manufacturer's address (York, PA, USA) and FDA 510(k) clearance, it is highly likely the testing was conducted in the US or by a facility adhering to US regulatory standards. The data would be considered prospective as it involves controlled testing to validate device performance.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This type of information is generally not applicable to a medical device like a sterilization cassette, which undergoes performance testing (e.g., sterilization efficacy, material durability, functional design). The "ground truth" for such a device is established through scientific and engineering standards and validated laboratory testing, not expert consensus on interpretations of images or clinical outcomes. Therefore, no experts in the sense of medical specialists interpreting data are explicitly mentioned as establishing a "ground truth" here. The validation would be performed by qualified engineers, microbiologists, and technicians.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in clinical trials or studies where human interpretation of ambiguous data requires consensus. For the performance testing of a sterilization cassette, the "adjudication" is based on objective measurements and established pass/fail criteria according to validated protocols and standards (e.g., microbial kill, material integrity, functional checks). There is no mention of an adjudication method involving multiple human readers for consensus.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

An MRMC comparative effectiveness study is not applicable as this device is a physical instrument for sterilization, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool requiring human interpretation improvement.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This refers to AI algorithm performance and is not applicable to a physical sterilization cassette.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

The ground truth for this device is established by:

• Sterilization Efficacy: Meeting established sterility assurance levels (SAL) for steam sterilization, likely demonstrated through biological indicator studies (e.g., killing of specified microorganisms like Geobacillus stearothermophilus) and physical parameters (temperature, pressure, time). This would fall under microbiological testing/standards compliance.
• Durability: Physical integrity and functionality of the cassette after a specified number of sterilization cycles, assessed through visual inspection and functional testing, falling under engineering and material performance standards.
• Functional Design: The ability to hold instruments, fit standard autoclaves, and be used with sterilization wrap, as per the device description and indications.

8. The sample size for the training set

The concept of a "training set" is relevant for machine learning algorithms. This device is a physical medical device, not an algorithm. Therefore, there is no training set in the AI sense. The design and manufacturing process would involve extensive engineering, material testing, and quality control, but this is distinct from "training data."

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

As there is no training set for an AI algorithm, this question is not applicable. The "ground truth" for the device's design and manufacturing is derived from engineering specifications, industry standards for medical device materials, sterilization guidelines (e.g., AAMI, ISO), and regulatory requirements for instrument sterilization.

Ask a specific question about this device