Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K062302
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-10-06

    (59 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6740
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MILLICORE AB DIGIVENT CHEST DRAINAGE SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System is indicated to evacuate air and/or fluid from the chest cavity or mediastinum, to help prevent air and/or fluid from reaccumulating in the chest cavity or mediastinum, to help re-establish and maintain normal intrathoracic pressure gradients, and to facilitate complete lung re-expansion and restore normal breathing dynamics.

    Device Description

    The DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System consists primarily of a collection chamber and a Controller Unit. Pressure regulator, drainage tubing (with kink prevention), positive- and negative pressure relief valves, and hangers complete the system. Thoracic catheters (chest tubes) are not included.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the Millicore AB DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System. Based on the provided text, a comprehensive study with specific acceptance criteria and detailed results proving the device meets these criteria is not detailed. The document states that "Design verification and validation testing provided in this premarket notification for the DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System demonstrates that it meets its specifications," but it does not elaborate on what those specifications or the results of the testing were.

    Therefore, the following information is an interpretation based on the general context of device approval documents and the lack of specific details in the provided text.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    As the specific acceptance criteria and detailed performance metrics are not explicitly stated in the provided text, this table will reflect the types of criteria generally expected for such a device and the general assertion of performance provided in the document.

    Acceptance Criterion (Inferred)Reported Device Performance
    Functional Performance
    Air evacuationMet (implied by "evacuate air")
    Fluid evacuationMet (implied by "evacuate fluid")
    Prevention of reaccumulationMet (implied by "prevent air and/or fluid from reaccumulating")
    Re-establishment of intrathoracic pressureMet (implied by "re-establish and maintain normal intrathoracic pressure gradients")
    Facilitation of lung re-expansionMet (implied by "facilitate complete lung re-expansion")
    Restoration of breathing dynamicsMet (implied by "restore normal breathing dynamics")
    Safety and Reliability
    Kink preventionMet (explicitly mentioned: "drainage tubing (with kink prevention)")
    Positive pressure reliefMet (explicitly mentioned: "positive- and negative pressure relief valves")
    Negative pressure reliefMet (explicitly mentioned: "positive- and negative pressure relief valves")
    Adherence to specificationsMet (explicitly stated: "demonstrates that it meets its specifications")
    Substantial equivalence to predicate devicesAchieved (stated in K062302 approval letter)

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not provide details on the sample size used for any test set or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective nature of data). It generically mentions "Design verification and validation testing."

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not provided in the document. Ground truth establishment, if any, for performance testing is not detailed.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not provided in the document.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and Effect Size

    The document does not mention any MRMC comparative effectiveness study, nor does it discuss human reader improvement with or without AI assistance. The DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System is a medical device for drainage, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or imaging tool.

    6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

    This question is not applicable as the DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or AI system. Its performance would inherently be in conjunction with human use (e.g., a clinician connecting and monitoring it).

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The document does not specify the type of ground truth used for any testing. Given it's a physical device, ground truth would likely be based on objective physical measurements and functional performance against defined engineering and safety standards, rather than expert consensus on medical images or pathology.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable as the DigiVent™ Chest Drainage System is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable for the same reason as above.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1