Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K022886
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2002-11-25

    (87 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3720
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    METATARSOPHALANGEAL FLEXIBLE STABILIZING ROD SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Indicated for partial or complete dislocation of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joint; pain associated with either rheumatoid or osteoarthritis; repair for unsuccessful arthroplasties of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joint; stiffness at the lesser metatarsophalangeal joint associated with joint disease; hammertoe deformity where the proximal phalanx is dorsally located on the metatarsal in a fixed contracture state. Implants are single use only.

    Device Description

    The OsteoMed Metatarsophalangeal Flexible Stabilizing Rod System is a stemmed flexible implant specifically designed for replacement of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints of the foot. It is constructed of medical grade silicone elastomer. The OsteoMed Metatarsophalangeal Flexible Stabilizing Rods are offered in diameters of 2.5mm through 3.0mm. Drills and sizers will also be a part of the system.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets any acceptance criteria. The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the "OsteoMed Metatarsophalangeal Flexible Stabilizing Rod System." It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Sgarlato Lesser Toe Implant K884739) based on similarities in intended use, material, design, and operational principle.

    The document does not contain details regarding:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes for test sets or data provenance.
    3. Number of experts or their qualifications for establishing ground truth.
    4. Adjudication methods.
    5. Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies.
    6. Standalone performance studies.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

    This type of information is typically associated with performance studies, especially those involving AI/ML devices or novel devices requiring more extensive clinical evidence. The provided document is a regulatory submission for a device deemed substantially equivalent to a predicate, which often does not require new performance studies if the safety and effectiveness are established through the predicate.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1