Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K113858
    Date Cleared
    2012-01-24

    (25 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MEGABEAM ENDO-ENT PROBE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The MegaBeam Endo-ENT Probe is a fiber optic delivery system intended as an aid for otologic procedures, for use in incision, excision, coagulation and vaporization of soft and fibrous tissue including osseous tissue. It is indicated for ENT surgery for use with compatible lasers cleared for use in the desired application.

    Device Description

    The MegaBeam Endo ENT Probe for Biolitec Medical Devices, Inc. contains the identical same components and design as the device cleared under K952772 for Biolitec Inc. There are no differences in technology and as such does not raise any new questions on safety or efficacy.

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) summary states that the MegaBeam Endo-ENT Probe is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared device (MegaBeam Endo ENT Probe, K952772). Therefore, it relies on the predicate device's established performance without new studies.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information based only on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Safety"as safe... as the MegaBeam Endo-ENT Probe predicate device."
    Effectiveness"as effective ... as the MegaBeam Endo-ENT Probe predicate device."
    Technological Characteristics"contains the identical same components and design as the device cleared under K952772...no differences in technology."

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    Not applicable. No new performance testing was conducted for this submission (K113858). The device is asserted to be identical to its predicate (K952772).

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    Not applicable. No new performance testing was conducted for this submission.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. No new performance testing was conducted for this submission.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and Effect Size

    No. An MRMC study was not done for this submission.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    Not applicable. This device is a physical medical probe, not an algorithm.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    Not applicable for this submission as no new performance data was generated. The "ground truth" for demonstrating equivalence relies on the predicate device's historical clearance and established safe and effective use.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This device is a physical medical probe, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires training.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. This device is a physical medical probe, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires training.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1