Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K092250
    Date Cleared
    2010-01-21

    (177 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5130
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MEDLINE RED RUBBER URETHRAL CATHETER

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Medline's urethral catheter is a flexible tubular device that is intended for use in the drainage of fluid from the urinary tract.

    Device Description

    flexible tubular device

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA to Medline Industries, Inc. regarding their Red Rubber Urethral Catheter. This document indicates the device has received clearance and is "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices.

    However, this document does not contain any information regarding specific acceptance criteria, a study proving device performance against those criteria, or details typically found in a clinical or performance study report.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the following information based on the provided text:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: The document does not define any specific acceptance criteria or report performance metrics for the device.
    2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance: There is no mention of a test set, sample sizes, or data provenance.
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Ground truth establishment is not discussed as no study is detailed.
    4. Adjudication method for the test set: No adjudication method is mentioned.
    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: No MRMC study is mentioned, and the device described is a physical catheter, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.
    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable as this is a physical device, not an algorithm.
    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Ground truth is not discussed.
    8. The sample size for the training set: No training set is mentioned.
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable as no training set is discussed.

    This FDA letter is a regulatory clearance document, not a detailed scientific study report. To find the information you're looking for, you would typically need to consult the original 510(k) submission summary or a separate clinical study report, if such a study was performed and made public.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1