Search Results

The MAMMOLOADER is a device designed to unload and or load medical imaging films from the KODAK Mammography film cassettes (18x24 cm & 24x30 cm) and KODAK Video Film Holder (8x10 in), under roomlight conditions.

Two versions are available; integrated with a medical imaging film processor so that when film cassettes are unloaded the film is sent directly into the film processor, or in a stand-alone version in which exposed films are unloaded from cassettes and placed into a receive magazine for processing at a later time.

The MAMMOLOADER will be used to unload and or load medical imaging films from the KODAK Mammography film cassettes (18x24 cm & 24x30 cm) and KODAK Video Film Holder (8x10 in), under roomlight conditions.

Two versions are available; integrated with a medical imaging film processor so that when film cassettes are unloaded the film is sent directly into the film processor, or in a stand-alone version in which exposed films are unloaded from cassettes and placed into a receive magazine for processing at a later time.

The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the MAMMOLOADER device and its clearance by the FDA, but it does not contain information about a study that measures device performance against acceptance criteria in the context of diagnostic accuracy or clinical outcomes.

The MAMMOLOADER is a device for loading and unloading medical imaging films from cassettes under roomlight conditions. The 510(k) summary focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (KODAK X-OMAT Multiloader 300) and compliance with general safety and electrical standards, rather than presenting a performance study with specific acceptance criteria for diagnostic output.

Therefore, the following information CANNOT be extracted from the provided text:

• A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This type of performance data (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, error rates) is not provided. The "performance" mentioned in the document relates to compliance with regulatory standards and the device's intended function (loading/unloading films), not diagnostic capabilities.
• Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: No test set is described for evaluating diagnostic performance.
• Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Ground truth establishment is not relevant in the context of this device's regulatory submission.
• Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
• If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: This is an film loader/unloader, not an AI or diagnostic tool. MRMC studies are not relevant.
• If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable, as this is not an algorithm.
• The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable.
• The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
• How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

What the document does state regarding acceptance criteria and "studies":

The "acceptance criteria" for this device, as implied by the 510(k) summary, are primarily regulatory and safety compliance. The "study" mentioned is more accurately a demonstration of compliance and substantial equivalence rather than a clinical performance study measuring accuracy or efficacy in a diagnostic sense.

Here's an interpretation based on the provided text:

Acceptance Criteria and Device "Performance" (as implied by regulatory submission):

Study Information (limited to regulatory compliance and substantial equivalence):

1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. No "test set" in the context of diagnostic performance.
2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable.
3. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done: No, this device is a film loader/unloader, not an AI or diagnostic interpretation tool.
5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: No, not an algorithm.
6. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable.
7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

In summary, the provided document is a 510(k) FDA submission for a film loading/unloading device. It demonstrates compliance with safety and electrical standards and substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which is the "proof" required for its clearance. It does not involve a diagnostic performance study with clinical acceptance criteria, ground truth, or expert review.

Ask a specific question about this device