Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(31 days)
LUXACORE/LUXACORE DUAL
The principal use for LuxaCore and LuxaCore Dual is as a core material either with adhesives or with pins or posts.
LuxaCore and LuxaCore Dual can also be used for:
- . Luting of abutments to dentures (LuxaCore)
- . Splinting of teeth in combination with wires, Kevlar or Ribbond-type materials
- . Repair material for provisionals
- . Bite registration material.
- . Build up material for plastic bite rails (occlusal individualisation).
- . Cement for pins and posts
- . Semipermanent restorative material (e.g., in childrens' teeth)
LuxaCore: LuxaCore is a chemical-curing, radiopaque two-component core build-up material supplied in automix delivery systems or as a handmix material.
LuxaCore Dual: LuxaCore Dual is a dual cure (chemical and/or light cure), radiopaque two-component core build-up material supplied in automix delivery systems or as a handmix material
The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for dental materials (LuxaCore / LuxaCore Dual) and does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets said criteria in the context of an AI/medical imaging device.
Specifically, the document:
- Describes dental core build-up and restorative materials.
- Identifies predicate devices for substantial equivalence.
- Lists indications for use for the dental materials.
- States it's an Abbreviated 510(k) and references conformity with FDA guidance for "Dental Composites - Premarket Notification."
- Concludes the materials are "safe and effective for their intended use" based on technological characteristics and comparison to predicate devices.
- Includes correspondence from the FDA confirming substantial equivalence.
There is no mention of:
- Acceptance criteria in terms of performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) for an AI device.
- Any study that tests an AI algorithm's performance against such criteria.
- Sample sizes for test or training sets, data provenance, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or types of ground truth relevant to AI performance evaluation.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving an AI device meets them based on the provided text.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1