Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K974139
    Date Cleared
    1998-01-28

    (86 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.1500
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The LQET Cannula/Trocar System provides access for instruments during laproscopic/endoscopic surgical procedures.

    Device Description

    The LifeQuest Endoscopic Technologies, Inc., (LQET) CannulaTrocar System is composed of several components: cannula system, trocar/obturator, sealing caps, valve, and accessories. The cannulas are have working lengths of 40-110mm and internal diameters of 3-20mm. Single and Multi Port Caps are available. The trocars are available in pyramidal, blunt and conical shaped configurations with lengths and diameters to fir the cannulas. Both shielded and non-shielded trocar configurations are available. Cannula Accessories such as Hassan Suture Anchors, Stopcocks and Sealing Caps are available with the LQET Cannula/Trocar System. All devices that are provided sterile to the user are sterilized by ethylene oxide by the manufacturer. Reusable devices are recommended for sterilization by autoclave at the user facility.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not contain acceptance criteria or a study that establishes device performance against such criteria.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for the LQET Cannula/Trocar System, focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than proving a specific performance level of the device itself through a formal clinical study.

    Here's what the document does mention regarding "performance data," and why it doesn't fit your request:

    • "The LQET Cannula/Trocar System was subjected to performance bench testing in accordance with applicable industry and clinical standards." This is a general statement.
    • "A study to determine the effectiveness of the recommended cleaning procedures was performed and found to be acceptable." This relates to cleaning protocols, not the primary function or safety of the device in a clinical setting.
    • "The effectiveness of the recommended steam sterilization cycle for reusable components was performed and found to be acceptable." Again, this relates to sterilization, not the device's functional performance.
    • "Several bench tests were performed to verify that the device performs as intended and that repeat sterilization of the components showed no effect to the device function." This is the closest statement to performance, but it lacks any specific metrics, acceptance criteria, or quantitative results. It's a high-level summary of verification testing.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions about the study, sample sizes, experts, or ground truth, as that information is not present in the provided text.

    The document's purpose is to show that the LQET Cannula/Trocar System is "substantially equivalent" to existing, legally marketed devices. This means it has similar intended use, technological characteristics, and safety/effectiveness profiles, based on a comparison to predicate devices, rather than through a a de novo clinical performance study with predefined acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1