Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K992597
    Date Cleared
    2000-04-24

    (265 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    LORAD LT-100 LASER TREATMENT SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    alone or in combination with an adjuvant lotion for the removal or lightening of unwanted facial or body hair. One or two treatments may be required for lightening or removing unwanted hair without the adjuvant lotion;

    in combination with an adjuvant lotion for skin resurfacing (ablation of epidermal skin layers) in dermatology and aesthetic surgery;

    dermal pigmented lesions (dermal melanocytosis); and

    for tattoo removal (dark and blue inks).

    The adjuvant lotion is a suspension of carbon powder in a base of Light Mineral Oil, NF.

    The LT-100 will be limited to use by licensed professionals (as provided in 21 CFR 801.109).

    Device Description

    The LT-100 Laser Treatment System is a Q-Switched Nd:YAG which emits its energy at 1064 nm.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness for the LT-100 Laser Treatment System. It states that performance data was not required for this device because its specifications and intended uses are the same as or very similar (substantially equivalent) to those of the claimed predicate devices (ThermoLase SoftLight, Continuum Biomedical, Inc., Medlite™ and Medlite™ IV Q-Switched Nd:YAG Lasers). Therefore, there is no study provided within this document that details acceptance criteria and device performance in the way typically expected for novel devices requiring clinical validation.

    As a result, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, reported performance, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth establishment based on the provided text.

    The core of the submission is a claim of substantial equivalence, meaning the FDA did not require new performance data to be submitted for this device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1