Search Results

The indications of use for this device are:

• Retinal Photocoagulation
• Pan Retinal Photocoagulation
• Macular Photocoagulation
• Laser Trabeculoplasty
• Laser trabeculoplasty is photocoagulation of trabecular meshwork to treat Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG).
• Endocoagulation

Not Found

This looks like a 510(k) clearance letter for the LightLas 561 Ophthalmic Photocoagulator Laser. This kind of document typically does not contain the detailed study information you are asking for, as 510(k) applications demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting full clinical trial data on device performance against acceptance criteria.

Therefore, I cannot extract the following information from the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
4. Adjudication method
5. If a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and the effect size
6. If a standalone performance study was done
7. The type of ground truth used
8. The sample size for the training set
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

The document primarily states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices and lists its "Indications for Use." It does not provide performance metrics or details of studies used to demonstrate specific performance against acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device. The device is a "Photocoagulator Laser," which is a physical medical device, not a software-based diagnostic or AI/ML product that would typically involve the kind of performance metrics and study design you're asking about (e.g., ground truth, reader studies, test/training sets for algorithms).

Ask a specific question about this device