Search Results

The LIFENET Exchange System is an optional data transmission system that provides the capability to transmit 12-Lead ECG reports and other physiological data to a receiving device at a remote location. Data is received from the field and can be used for diagnosis, disposition, and therapy decisions by qualified medical personnel.

The LIFENET® Exchange System is an optional data transmission system that provides the capability to transmit 12-Lead ECG reports and other physiological data to a receiving device at a remote location. Data is received from the field and can be used for diagnosis, disposition, and therapy decisions by qualified medical personnel.

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Medtronic LIFENET Exchange System. However, it does not contain specific acceptance criteria, performance metrics, or details about a study to prove the device meets such criteria.

The document primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices for its intended use as a data transmission system for 12-Lead ECGs and other physiological data.

Therefore, many of the requested details cannot be extracted from the provided text.

Here is what can be inferred or explicitly stated based on the text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Not explicitly mentioned. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence through similar technological characteristics and performance claims, rather than detailing a specific clinical or technical test set with sample sizes.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Not explicitly mentioned. The concept of "ground truth" for a specific test set is not detailed in this 510(k) summary, as the primary focus is on functional equivalence.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Not explicitly mentioned.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• No, an MRMC study was not described. This device is a data transmission system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable in the typical sense of an algorithm's diagnostic performance. The device's "performance" refers to its ability to reliably transmit data, which is a standalone function. The "study" mentioned refers to verification and validation (V&V) of its components and overall system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

• Not explicitly mentioned in the context of diagnostic "ground truth." For a data transmission system, the "truth" would likely be the accurate and timely transmission of the physiological data created by other medical devices (e.g., the LIFEPAK 12 ECG).

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable/Not mentioned. This device is a data transmission system; it does not employ a "training set" in the context of machine learning algorithms.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable/Not mentioned.

In summary: The provided 510(k) summary for the LIFENET Exchange System focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices (LIFEPAK 12 data transmission and Phillips 12-Lead Transfer Station) by highlighting similar technological characteristics and functional performance in data transmission. It refers to general "verification and validation" activities but does not offer granular details about specific acceptance criteria, comprehensive studies with sample sizes, expert involvement, or ground truth methodologies that would typically be described for a diagnostic or algorithmic device.

Ask a specific question about this device