Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K012315
    Device Name
    LEVEEN ELECTRODE
    Date Cleared
    2001-10-11

    (80 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4400
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    LEVEEN ELECTRODE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The LeVeen™ Electrode is intended to be used in conjunction with a RadioTherapeutics Corporation radiofrequency (RF) generator for the thermal coagulation necrosis of soft tissue, including partial or complete ablation of nonresectable liver lesions.

    Device Description

    The device consists of a preshaped, multi-armed electrode array which is contained within a delivery cannula. The array is attached to a handle mechanism that deploys the array into the targeted tissue. In addition, each device is supplied with an insulated introducer sheath/stylet assembly to allow the physician to locate the target tissue prior to placing and deploying the electrode. The device is connected to a RadioTherapeutics RF generator so that RF energy passes from the array to a patient ground pad and heats the tissue surrounding the array.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document does not contain the information requested in the prompt. The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (LeVeen™ Electrode), which primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device for marketing purposes.

    Specifically, the document lacks details about:

    • Acceptance criteria for device performance.
    • A study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.
    • A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    • Sample sizes for test or training sets.
    • Data provenance.
    • Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    • Adjudication method.
    • MRMC comparative effectiveness study or its effect size.
    • Standalone algorithm performance.
    • Type of ground truth used.
    • How ground truth for the training set was established.

    The document states the device is "substantially equivalent" to a previously cleared device, implying that its safety and effectiveness are considered comparable based on existing data or device characteristics, rather than requiring a detailed new clinical or performance study with defined acceptance criteria to be presented in this summary.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1