Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K014087
    Date Cleared
    2002-03-04

    (83 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    LATEXX MANUFACTURING NON-CHLORINATED, POLYMER COATED, POWDER-FREE RUBBER LATEX EXAMINATION GLOVE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Non-chlorinated Power Free Natural Rubber Examination Glove is a single use device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the hand of the healthcare and similar personnel to prevent contamination between the healthcare personnel and the patient.

    Device Description

    Non-Chlorinated, Polymer Coated, Powder Free Natural Rubber Latex Examination Glove

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding a Latexx Manufacturing Non-Chlorinated, Polymer Coated, Powder Free Natural Rubber Latex Examination Glove. This document does not contain information about acceptance criteria for a device's performance, nor does it describe a study proving the device meets such criteria.

    The letter primarily:

    • Confirms the FDA's review of the 510(k) submission (K014087).
    • States that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
    • Informs the manufacturer that they can market the device subject to general controls.
    • Outlines general regulatory compliance requirements.
    • Provides contact information for further guidance.
    • Includes a separate "Indications for Use" statement, which defines the intended purpose of the device.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The document does not describe:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
    3. Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth establishment.
    4. Adjudication methods.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results.
    6. Standalone (algorithm-only) performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used in a study.
    8. Sample size for a training set.
    9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

    This document is a regulatory clearance letter, not a performance study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1