Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K013996
    Date Cleared
    2002-02-26

    (85 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    LATEX POWDERFREE STERILE EXAMINATION GLOVES, MODELS-EXTRA SMALL, SMALL, MEDIUM, LARGE, EXTRA LARGE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    A latex examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purpose that is worn on examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiners
    A sterile latex powderfree examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purpose that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiners.

    Device Description

    Latex Powder free Sterile Examination Gloves

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the acceptance criteria and a study for "Latex Powder free Sterile Examination Gloves."

    Here's the requested information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Performance Requirement)Reported Device Performance
    SterilityFails sterility (Related Defects)Meets the sterility assurance level.
    Freedom from holesHoles (Related Defects)Meets FDA pinhole requirement.
    Dimensions & ThicknessWidth, Length (Related Defects)Meets ASTM D 3578-01 Standard. (Implied)
    Physical Properties (after ageing)Before and After (Related Defects)Meets ASTM D 3578-01 Standard. (Implied)
    Tensile Strength: 14 Mpa (before & after ageing)
    Ultimate Elongation: 650% (min, before ageing), 600% (min, after ageing)
    Powder Free ResidueExceeds Maximum LimitMeets labeling claim. (Implied, if labeling claims "powder free")
    Exceeds Recommended Maximum Limit (Powder Amount, separate)
    Protein ContentExceeds Recommended Maximum LimitNot explicitly stated, but implied to meet claims.
    Powder AmountExceeds Recommended Maximum LimitMeets labeling claim. (Implied)

    Note: The document states "Performance data is the same as mentioned immediately above," referring to the table of "Technological characteristic of the gloves" and "Performance requirement." The "Non-clinical data" section then certifies that these requirements are met.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes for each test set. However, it does provide Inspection Levels and AQL values for some characteristics, which would imply specific sample sizes based on sampling plans. For instance:

    • Freedom from holes: Inspection Level 1, AQL 2.5
    • Dimensions & Thickness: Inspection Level S-2, AQL 4
    • Physical Properties (after ageing): Inspection Level S-2, AQL 4
    • Powder Free Residue: N=5
    • Protein Content: N=3
    • Powder Amount: N=2

    The data provenance is not explicitly stated in terms of country of origin but is from the manufacturer PT. Maja Agung Latexindo in North Sumatra, Indonesia. The study appears to be retrospective as it presents data for a device seeking 510(k) clearance based on established standards.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not provided in the document. The acceptance criteria are based on ASTM standards (ASTM D 3578-01), FDA pinhole requirements, and generally accepted sterility assurance levels. The compliance is certified by the manufacturer. There is no mention of external experts establishing ground truth for individual test cases.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not provided. The compliance is self-certified by the manufacturer against established standards.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance

    This is not applicable. The device is a physical product (latex gloves), not an AI diagnostic tool. No MRMC study or AI assistance is mentioned.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    This is not applicable. The device is a physical product (latex gloves), not an AI diagnostic tool.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth is based on established industry standards and regulatory requirements, specifically:

    • ASTM D 3578-01 Standard (for dimensions, physical properties)
    • FDA pinhole requirement
    • Sterility assurance level
    • Labeling claims (for powder free, powder amount)

    These standards define the objective measures for performance.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This is not applicable as the document describes the testing of a physical product, not the development of a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This is not applicable as there is no training set mentioned for this product.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1