Search Results

The KSEA Hydromat 263110-20 and Pressure Chambers are, indicated for use by qualified surgeons and physicians to provide low-pressure irrigation to the peritoneal cavity and operative sites during laparoscopic and pelviscopic surgical and diagnostic procedures.

These instruments are indicated for use by qualified surgeons and physicians to provide pressurized fluid, with a heating option, for irrigation to the surgical site or hydro-dissection during laparoscopic surgical and diagnostic procedures.

The KSEA Hydromat 263110-20 is a low-pressure infusion pump designed to deliver sterile irrigating fluid to the operative site. The KSEA Pressure Chambers are metal chambers designed to hold and pressurize bags of irrigation fluid for infusion into the peritoneal cavity; a pressure chamber is available which heats the irrigation fluid to body temperature or to slightly above body temperature. The Accessories (Tubing Sets) are designed to convey the sterile irrigation solution into the peritoneal cavity.

The provided text is a 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for a medical device: the KSEA Hydromat 263110-20, Pressure Chambers and Accessories. This summary details the device's intended use and describes how it is substantially equivalent to predicate devices. However, it does not contain information about specific acceptance criteria or a study designed to prove the device meets those criteria.

510(k) submissions primarily focus on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than presenting de novo clinical studies with detailed acceptance criteria for performance. The document explicitly states: "The KSEA Hydromat 263110-20 and Pressure Chambers are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices since the basic features and intended uses are similar. The minor differences between the Karl Storz Hydromat 263110-20 and Pressure Chambers and the predicate devices raise no new issues of safety and effectiveness, as these differences have no effect on the performance, function or intended use of these devices."

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from the given text alone. The document does not describe:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
2. Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
3. Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth.
4. Adjudication methods.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness studies.
6. Standalone algorithm performance studies.
7. Type of ground truth used in a study.
8. Sample size for a training set.
9. How ground truth for a training set was established.

Ask a specific question about this device