Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(157 days)
KOO SMALL VOLUME NEBULIZER (SVN)
The Koo SVN is a handheld, pneumatic nebulizer designed to aerosolize prescription drugs for inhalation by a patient. Its use is indicated whenever a healthcare professional administers or prescribes medical aerosol products to a patient using a small volume nebulizer.
The Koo SVN is intended for use with pediatric (defined by the prescribed medication) and adult patients consistent with the indications for the aerosol medication. This includes hospital/institutional settings, home care use, schools and long term care facilities.
The Koo SVN is a simple handheld small volume nebulizer powered by compressed air to nebulize the I ne Noo S V It is a simple handler shall vith a mouthpiece or standard aerosol / oxygen face mask. The SVN can be packaged with optional accessories, i.e., oxygen tubing, mouthpiece and hose, and face mask. The nebulizer and its accessories are single patient, multi-use devices.
The provided submission describes the Koo Small Volume Nebulizer (SVN). The device is a handheld, pneumatic nebulizer designed to aerosolize prescription drugs for inhalation. The study presented is a comparative performance study against a predicate device, the Miller (VixOne) nebulizer (K926055). The acceptance criteria are essentially defined by the performance of this predicate device, demonstrating substantial equivalence.
Here's the detailed breakdown:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria for the Koo SVN are implicitly defined by performing "equivalently" to the predicate device, Miller (VixOne) K926055, across various particle characterization metrics. The study aims to show that the Koo SVN's performance falls within a similar range as the predicate.
| Metric (Drug) | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: Miller (VixOne) K926055) | Reported Device Performance (Koo SVN) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Output (ug) | ||
| Albuterol | $1160 \pm 96$ | $1005 \pm 21$ |
| Ipratropium | $196 \pm 7$ | $184 \pm 10$ |
| Cromolyn | $4344 \pm 353$ | $4156 \pm 113$ |
| Particle Size (MMAD) (Microns) | ||
| Albuterol | $2.10 \pm 0.17$ | $1.80 \pm 0.2$ |
| Ipratropium | $1.93 \pm 0.06$ | $1.90 \pm 0.1$ |
| Cromolyn | $1.57 \pm 0.21$ | $1.53 \pm 0.06$ |
| Geometric Std. Dev. (GSD) | ||
| Albuterol | $3.00 \pm 0.25$ | $2.84 \pm 0.14$ |
| Ipratropium | $3.11 \pm 0.48$ | $2.71 \pm 0.1$ |
| Cromolyn | $2.83 \pm 0.05$ | $2.63 \pm 0.2$ |
| Respirable Fraction (% Mass 0.5-5 microns) | ||
| Albuterol | $67.3% \pm 3.2%$ | $69.0% \pm 2.0%$ |
| Ipratropium | $66.7% \pm 5.8%$ | $70.3% \pm 0.6%$ |
| Cromolyn | $68.0% \pm 2.0%$ | $71.0% \pm 3.6%$ |
| Respirable Mass (ug 0.5 - 5.0 microns) | ||
| Albuterol | $781 \pm 71$ | $693 \pm 17$ |
| Ipratropium | $131 \pm 13$ | $129 \pm 6$ |
| Cromolyn | $2949 \pm 155$ | $2953 \pm 232$ |
| Treatment Time (min) | ||
| Albuterol | $4.33 \pm 0.38$ | $4.00 \pm 0$ |
| Ipratropium | $2.92 \pm 0.38$ | $2.67 \pm 0.29$ |
| Cromolyn | $1.58 \pm 0.38$ | $1.50 \pm 0$ |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The document states that the testing provided a "95% confidence level." While the exact number of samples for each specific measurement (e.g., total output, particle size for each drug) is not explicitly stated as a single number, the statistical confidence level (95%) implies a sufficient sample size was used for each test to achieve this confidence.
- Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective. It is implied that the testing was conducted by the manufacturer, KOO (Shanghai) Industries Co., Ltd., as part of the 510(k) submission process, making it prospective testing for the purpose of demonstrating substantial equivalence.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This type of study (comparative performance of a nebulizer using physical measurements) does not involve human experts establishing "ground truth" in the way a diagnostic AI study would. The ground truth here is the measurable physical properties of aerosolized drugs, determined through standardized laboratory techniques (Cascade Impactor). Therefore, this question is not applicable to this submission.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. As noted above, this study does not involve expert review or adjudication of results. The results are physical measurements.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This is a study comparing the physical performance characteristics of a medical device (nebulizer) to a predicate device, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool involving human readers.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Not applicable. The Koo SVN is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or software-driven device. The submission explicitly states "Software driven: No."
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this study is derived from objective physical measurements obtained through standardized laboratory testing, specifically "Particle Characterization per Cascade Impactor." This method directly measures key aerosol performance parameters such as Total Output, Particle Size (MMAD), Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD), Respirable Fraction, and Respirable Mass.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. As a physical medical device and not an AI or machine learning algorithm, there is no "training set."
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. There is no training set for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1