Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K162667
    Date Cleared
    2017-05-11

    (227 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.6110
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Kitazato IUI Catheter

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Kitazato IUI Catheter is used for the introduction of washed spermatozoa into the uterine cavity through the cervix. Kitazato IUI Stylet is used to provide rigidity and assist in maintaining the shape of the catheter shaft.

    Device Description

    The Kitazato IUI Catheter is a set of intrauterine insemination (IUI) catheters comprised of two different models that include either no stainless steel core (Type 4) or a stainless steel core (Type 5). Each type of catheter has a 10 cm or 18 cm catheter shaft length that incorporates an outer stiffener component and a syringe connector. The distal tip of the catheter shaft is rounded and includes two side holes 3 mm from the tip of the catheter for sperm delivery. The catheter shaft also includes depth marker bands at 5, 6, 7, and 8 cm from the distal tip to aid in delivery of the device to the targeted depth.

    The catheter is composed of a polyvinyl chloride shaft and an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) connector. The Stylet Cannula (Type 6) used with the Type 4 catheter is composed of a stainless steel cannula (SUS304) and an ABS syringe connector. The Stylet Cannula's stainless steel core provides rigidity and assists in maintaining the shape of the catheter shaft when the uterine cervix is sharply curved. The Stylet Cannula is inserted into the catheter shaft through the connector end and then the IUI Catheter is inserted into the cervix. During an IUI procedure, the catheter is introduced into the uterine cavity through the cervix, and the spermatozoa are injected into the uterine cavity by a syringe (not included) that is coupled at the connector end (6% taper connection) of the catheter shaft.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the Kitazato IUI Catheter. Here's an analysis of the provided information concerning acceptance criteria and supporting studies:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    TestAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Mechanical Tensile TestingPassed established specificationsPassed
    Dimensional TestingConforms to outer diameter and length specificationsPassed
    Appearance TestingPasses visual inspection for scratches, burrs, and foreign objectsPassed
    Endotoxin Testing (per ANSI/AAMI ST72:2002/(R)2010)≤ 20 EU/deviceConforms to specification
    Sterility Testing (per USP )No microbial growthNo microbial growth
    Biocompatibility Testing (per ISO 10993-1:2009 and 2016 FDA guidance)Cytotoxicity: Passed
    Sensitization: Passed
    Irritation: PassedPassed cytotoxicity, intracutaneous reactivity (irritation), and sensitization
    Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA)≥ 70% motility at 24 hours≥ 70% motility at 24 hours
    Color fastness of the depth marker bandsNo change in appearance after conditioningNo change in appearance
    Shelf Life TestingEstablished three (3) year shelf lifeEstablished three (3) year shelf life
    Package Integrity Testing (per ISO 11607-1:2006(R)2014, ISO 11607-2:2006)Passed dye penetration, seal strength, and visual inspectionPassed dye penetration, seal strength, and visual inspection

    2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not specify the exact sample sizes used for each individual non-clinical performance test (e.g., number of catheters tested for tensile strength, number of samples for HSSA, etc.). It only states that the device "passed all the testing."

    Data provenance is not explicitly mentioned as country of origin, however, the submission sponsor is KITAZATO Corporation in Japan, and the predicate device is from KITAZATO Medical Co., Ltd. This implies the studies were likely conducted or overseen by the Japanese manufacturer. The studies are non-clinical, implying they are laboratory-based tests rather than human studies, therefore the retrospective or prospective nature is not applicable in the same way it would be for clinical trials.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. The reported studies are non-clinical performance tests for a medical device (catheter), not diagnostic studies requiring expert interpretation of results to establish ground truth.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable, as these are non-clinical performance tests with objective pass/fail criteria, not subjective human-interpreted data requiring adjudication.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and Effect Size

    No. An MRMC comparative effectiveness study is designed for evaluating diagnostic tools where human readers are involved in interpreting results. This document describes non-clinical performance tests of a physical medical device.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    Yes, standalone performance was done in the sense that the device itself was subjected to a series of tests to verify its physical, chemical, and biological properties without human intervention in the device's function during the test itself (e.g., tensile strength, sterility, biocompatibility).

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth for these non-clinical tests is established by recognized international standards and specifications (e.g., ANSI/AAMI, USP, ISO 10993, ISO 11607). For instance:

    • Mechanical properties: Engineering specifications for tensile strength, dimensions.
    • Sterility: Absence of microbial growth, as defined by USP .
    • Endotoxin: Endotoxin levels below a specified threshold, as defined by ANSI/AAMI ST72.
    • Biocompatibility: Absence of cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation as evaluated against ISO 10993 standards and FDA guidance.
    • HSSA: A specific percentage of sperm motility after a defined period (≥70% at 24 hours).
    • Package Integrity: Meeting requirements of ISO 11607.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This report details acceptance criteria and performance data for a medical device based on non-clinical testing, not a machine learning or AI algorithm that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable for the same reason as above (no training set for a non-AI medical device).

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K131491
    Date Cleared
    2013-09-11

    (111 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.6110
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    KITAZATO IUI CATHETER

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Kitazato IUI Catheter consist of the following versions:

    • Kitazato IUI Catheter with Outer Stiffener with Stylet Cannula, 18 cm, model number . Type 3-v1
    • . Kitazato IUI Catheter with Outer Stiffener without Stylet Cannula, 18cm, model number Type 3-v2
      Kitazato IUI Catheter is used for the introduction of washed spermatozoa into the uterine cavity through the cervix.
    Device Description

    Kitazato IUI Catheter with Outer Stiffener Type with Stylet Cannula and without Stylet Cannula are recommended for uterine cervix with an anatomical curve because the catheter shaft can be easily manipulated. The Kitazato IUI Catheter is composed of an 18 cm catheter shaft that incorporates an outer stiffener component and a syringe connector. The distal tip of the catheter shaft is rounded and includes two side holes 3 mm from the tip of the catheter for sperm delivery. The catheter shaft also includes depth marker bands at 5, 6, 7, and 8 cm from the distal tip, and a movable stopper to aid in delivery of the device to the targeted depth.
    The catheter is composed of a polyvinyl chloride shaft and an ABS connector. The Stylet Cannula of the Type 3-v1 version of the device is composed of a stainless steel cannula (SUS304) and an ABS syringe connector. The Stylet Cannula provides rigidity and assists in maintaining the shape of the catheter shaft when the uterine cervix is sharply curved. The Stylet Cannula is inserted into the catheter shaft through the connector end and then the IUI Catheter is inserted into the cervix. The spermatozoa can be introduced into the uterine cavity by the syringe that is connected to the stylet cannula with no need to remove the stylet cannula from the IUI Catheter. The syringe connector on both the catheter and stylet cannula has a 6% taper that is compatible with 6% taper connection syringe (note: syringe is not included with the catheter).

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Kitazato IUI Catheter. It describes the device, its intended use, and demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device. However, it does not include descriptions of acceptance criteria as typically understood in a medical device study (e.g., specific performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy compared to a benchmark). Instead, it discusses the device's technical specifications and the results of non-clinical (laboratory) tests to demonstrate that the device meets those specifications and is comparable to a predicate device.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document doesn't provide a typical "acceptance criteria" table with performance metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity, as it's a 510(k) submission focused on substantial equivalence rather than a clinical performance study of an AI/algorithmic device. Instead, it lists the results of non-clinical tests against established specifications.

    Test CategoryAcceptance Criteria (Implied / Stated)Reported Device Performance
    Mechanical TensileEstablished specificationPassed the established specification
    DimensionalSpecifications for outer diameter and lengthPasses outer diameter and length according to specifications
    Endotoxin≤ 20 EU/deviceEndotoxin values conform to the value ≤20 EU/device
    SterilityNo microbial growthNo microbial growth from sterility testing
    BiocompatibilityPassed all testing (cytotoxicity, intracutaneous reactivity, sensitization)Passed all testing for cytotoxicity, intracutaneous reactivity, and sensitization
    Phthalates (DEHP) ReleaseAccording to specificationsPassed according to specifications
    Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA)≥ 70% motility at 24 hours≥70% motility at 24 hours
    Shelf LifeEstablished three (3) yearsEstablished three (3) years

    Relevant Study Information:

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

      • The document describes non-clinical testing (mechanical, dimensional, endotoxin, sterility, biocompatibility, phthalates release, human sperm survival assay, and shelf life). It does not specify sample sizes for these tests, nor does it refer to a "test set" in the context of clinical data for algorithmic performance. Data provenance would be from manufacturing and laboratory testing.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

      • Not applicable. This document does not describe a study involving expert-established ground truth for an algorithmic device's performance. The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests are the objective specifications and assay results.
    3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

      • Not applicable. This document does not describe adjudication for a test set.
    4. If a multi-reader multicase (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

      • Not applicable. This is a medical device (catheter) and not an AI/algorithmic device. No MRMC study was conducted.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

      • Not applicable. This is a medical device (catheter) and not an AI/algorithmic device. No standalone algorithm performance was assessed.
    6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

      • For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" is based on pre-defined engineering specifications, chemical/biological standards, and laboratory assay results. For example, sperm motility percentage is a direct measurement against a set threshold.
    7. The sample size for the training set:

      • Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm. There is no concept of a "training set."
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

      • Not applicable. (See #8)
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1