Search Results

Use for temporary cannulation for vascular access for extracorporeal blood treatment. This device is intended for single use only and is for temporary catheterization less than 30 days.

Needle, Fistula

This is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device (JMS AV Fistula Needle) and an "Indication for Use" document. These documents do not contain the detailed information required to describe acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance as requested.

The information typically found in such a regulatory submission, but missing from these documents, includes:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance: This would detail specific quantitative or qualitative measures the device had to meet (e.g., tensile strength, flow rate, biocompatibility standards, sterility assurance level) and the actual results obtained from testing.
2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance: Number of units tested, source of materials or patients, and whether the data was collected retrospectively or prospectively.
3. Number of experts and their qualifications for establishing ground truth: This almost exclusively applies to diagnostic imaging or AI devices, not a simple needle. For a physical device, performance is typically measured against established engineering or biological standards.
4. Adjudication method: Again, this is for clinical interpretation, not physical device testing.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study: This is relevant for AI-assisted diagnostic devices, not a fistula needle.
6. Standalone performance study: This would detail the performance characteristics of the fistula needle itself, such as design verification and validation testing, but not in the context of an "algorithm."
7. Type of ground truth used: For a physical device, ground truth would be based on validated objective measurements against specifications and standards, not "expert consensus" or "pathology" in the diagnostic sense.
8. Sample size for the training set: Not applicable for this type of device. Training sets are for machine learning algorithms.
9. How ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

In summary, based on the provided documents, I cannot fulfill your request as the necessary information regarding acceptance criteria and detailed study results is not present. This letter is a regulatory clearance, not a technical report on device performance testing.

Ask a specific question about this device