Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K123958
    Date Cleared
    2013-10-28

    (311 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.5890
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    JIAJIAN POINTOSELECT DIGITAL

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Jiajian® Pointoselect Digital is intended for use in the symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain, postoperative pain, and acute pain.

    Device Description

    Jiajian® Pointoselect Digital is a newly designed and easy to operate hand held stimulator. It is 9V battery powered device, with an LCD in the console. which can display the selected operation mode, intensity, frequency, pulse width, and battery level of the device, and so on. The device composes of a console, a hand held probe, a hand grip electrode, and lead wires. The hand probe can be used for treatment at individual sites. When using the hand probe, the patient must hold the hand grip electrode in order to electrically ground the device.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not describe a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy. Instead, it details a 510(k) summary for a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator (TENS) device, the Jiajian® Pointoselect Digital, focusing on its substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Pointer Excel) based on technical characteristics and compliance with safety and biocompatibility standards.

    Therefore, many of the requested categories (sample size, data provenance, ground truth, experts, adjudication, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set) are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this document, as they relate to clinical studies or performance evaluations that are not present.

    However, I can extract the acceptance criteria related to technical specifications and safety standards compliance and the reported performance based on the substantial equivalence discussion and safety and effectiveness section.


    Here's the information that can be extracted based on the provided document:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The "acceptance criteria" here are defined by the comparison to the predicate device and compliance with established safety/biocompatibility standards.

    FeatureAcceptance Criteria (Predicate Device K060517 Performance)Reported Device Performance (Jiajian® Pointoselect Digital)Notes
    Intended UseSymptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain, postoperative pain, and acute pain.Symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain, postoperative pain, and acute pain.Met: Identical intended use.
    Power SourceDC 9V battery, Type 6F229 Volt battery type 6F22 (Carbon-zinc), or 9 Volt battery type 6LR61 (Alkaline)Met: Similar DC battery power source.
    WaveformBiphasicBiphasicMet: Identical waveform.
    ShapeAsymmetric biphasic square waveAsymmetric biphasic square waveMet: Identical wave shape.
    Net Charge0μC@500Ω0μC @500Ω, + and - pulses cancelMet: Identical net charge.
    Frequency Range1-16Hz2~18HzMet: Similar frequency range, subject to "differences would not raise new safety concerns."
    Maximum Output Voltage11V ±15% @500Ω6.6V ±15% @500ΩDifferent: Lower for new device. Document asserts "differences would not raise new safety concerns."
    Maximum Output Current22mA ±15% @500Ω13.2mA ±15% @500ΩDifferent: Lower for new device. Document asserts "differences would not raise new safety concerns."
    Pulse Duration220μS60-120μSDifferent: Shorter for new device. Document asserts "differences would not raise new safety concerns."
    Maximum Phase Charge4.8μC@500Ω2.4μC@500ΩDifferent: Lower for new device. Document asserts "differences would not raise new safety concerns."
    Maximum Current Density (r.m.s.)10.35mA/cm²@500Ω12.08mA/cm²@500ΩSimilar: Slightly higher for new device. Document states "similar maximum output current density."
    Safety Standard ComplianceIEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 60601-1-2 (for predicate)IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 60601-1-2 (for new device)Met: New device was tested and found to meet these safety standards.
    Biocompatibility StandardsISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10 (for predicate)ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10 (for new device, specifically pointer probe)Met: New device's pointer probe was tested and found to comply with these biocompatibility standards. Lead wires also tested to IEC 60601-1.
    Battery Life ImpactNot explicitly statedStimulus parameters not significantly affected (less than ±10%) with reduced battery level.Met: Specific testing for performance under reduced battery conditions.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    • Sample Size: Not applicable. The document describes a comparison of technical specifications and compliance with standards, not a clinical trial or performance study involving patient data.
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable, as no human subject data (retrospective or prospective) is discussed. The device is manufactured in Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    • Not applicable. There is no mention of "ground truth" established by experts in the context of clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy. The assessment is based on engineering specifications and adherence to standards.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    • Not applicable. No adjudication method is described as there is no clinical test set requiring it.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done

    • No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. This is a physical medical device (TENS) for pain relief, not an algorithm or AI system.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    • Not applicable. The document assesses the device against technical specifications and safety/biocompatibility standards, not against a "ground truth" derived from clinical outcomes or expert consensus.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. There is no "training set" as this is not an AI/ML device.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable. No training set is involved.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1