Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(90 days)
Isolation Gown AAMI Level 3
The Isolation Gown AAMI Level 3 is intended to protect health care personnel from the transfer of microorganisms, body fluids and particulate material. Not intended for use in the operating room. In addition, the Isolation Gown meets the requirements of an AAMI Level 3 barrier protection for an isolation gown per ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of Protective Apparel Drapes Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities(ANSI/AAMI PB70). The Isolation Gown is single use, disposable medical device provided non-sterile.
Not Found
The provided text is related to the FDA 510(k) clearance for an "Isolation Gown AAMI Level 3" and primarily concerns regulatory approval. It does not describe a study involving a device with AI or software components that would typically have acceptance criteria presented in the requested format.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe the acceptance criteria and study proving the device meets them, as the provided text pertains to a physical medical device (an isolation gown) and its regulatory clearance based on AAMI Level 3 barrier protection standards, not a software-driven device.
The information I can extract directly related to performance and standards is:
Acceptance Criteria for the Isolation Gown AAMI Level 3:
Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Meets the requirements of an AAMI Level 3 barrier protection for an isolation gown per ANSI/AAMI PB70:2012 Liquid Barrier Performance and Classification of Protective Apparel Drapes Intended for Use in Health Care Facilities (ANSI/AAMI PB70). | The device is stated to "meet the requirements of an AAMI Level 3 barrier protection". Specific test results (e.g., impact penetration, hydrostatic pressure according to AAMI PB70) are not detailed in this document but are implied to be satisfactory for clearance. |
The provided document does NOT contain information regarding:
- Sample size used for the test set or data provenance.
- Number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications.
- Adjudication method.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study or human reader improvement with AI.
- Standalone algorithm performance.
- Type of ground truth used (beyond implying compliance with AAMI PB70 standards, which often involve laboratory testing for physical properties).
- Sample size for the training set.
- How ground truth for the training set was established.
This is because the cleared device is a physical barrier product, not an AI/software as a medical device (SaMD). The assessment for such devices typically involves laboratory testing against established standards (like AAMI PB70) rather than clinical studies with human readers or AI algorithms.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1