Search Results

An Earloop Procedure Mask is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is r in Larrey i rexaminer's mouth and nose to prevent contamination between examiner and patient.

Earloop Procedure Mask ( BLUE, YELLOW)

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the Isosafe™ EarLoop Procedure Mask from the FDA. It declares the device substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.

However, the provided text does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, nor does it contain any of the specific details requested in the prompt.

The document primarily focuses on:

• The FDA's decision of substantial equivalence.
• Regulatory classifications and requirements.
• Contact information for compliance and assistance.
• A brief "Statement of Indications for Use" (page 2, Exhibit IV).

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information, such as:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
2. Sample size for the test set or data provenance.
3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
4. Adjudication method for the test set.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results or effect size.
6. Standalone algorithm performance.
7. Type of ground truth used.
8. Sample size for the training set.
9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

This document is a regulatory approval, not a performance study report.

Ask a specific question about this device

An Earloop Procedure Mask is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn over the examiner's mouth and nose to prevent contamination between examiner and patient.

Not Found

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the detailed information necessary to answer your request about acceptance criteria and a study proving a device meets them. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for an "Isosafe Earloop Procedure Mask."

It states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to previously marketed devices and permits the company to market it. However, it does not describe specific acceptance criteria (like performance metrics or thresholds) for the device itself, nor does it detail any specific study conducted by the manufacturer to demonstrate performance against such criteria.

The document primarily focuses on regulatory approval based on substantial equivalence, rather than a detailed presentation of performance data from a specific study.

Ask a specific question about this device