Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(71 days)
INTERCEPT ESOPHAGEAL INTERNAL MR COIL, INTERCEPT URETHRAL MICROCOIL, AND INTERCEPT VASCULAR INTERNAL
The Intercept™ Internal MR Coils are recommended for high-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of internal anatomical structures. The single use, disposable coils were designed to be inserted into body orifices of the patient during MRI scans in order to obtain improved image quality in the anatomical regions surrounding the coil. The unique coil shapes facilitate orientation of the coils to the anatomy. These products are to be used with a 1.5T Philips MRI system.
The Intercept™ Urethral Internal MR Coil is recommended for high-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the male and female urethra and surrounding tissue. The single use, disposable coil was designed to be inserted in the urethra of a patient during MRI scans in order to obtain improved image quality in the anatomical regions surrounding the urethra and including the prostate in males. The flexible coil facilitates placement of the coil in the anatomy, This product is to be used with a 1.5T Philips MRI system. The signals picked up by the coil are conducted through a small coaxial cable to a connection with the standard surface coil connector for MRI systems. The coil and cable are completely sealed inside the insulating layer.
The Intercept™ Vascular Internal MR Coil is recommended for high-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the peripheral vasculature. The single use, disposable coil is designed for insertion into an artery or vein of a patient during MRI scans in order to obtain improved image quality in the peripheral vasculature. The flexible coil facilitates placement of the coil in the peripheral vascular anatomy. The coil would most commonly be used through femoral artery access similar to .035" guidewires currently in use. The handling characteristics of this device are familiar to vascular interventionalists thereby facilitating integration into their practices. This product is to be used with a 1.5T Philips MRI system.
The Intercept™ Internal MR Coils are intracavitary specialty coils for use in MR imaging of the anatomical regions surrounding a body cavity. The signals picked up by the coil are conducted through a small coaxial cable and interfacing network to a connection with the standard surface coil connector for MRI systems. The coil is insulated with polymeric housing that protects is from contact from body fluids.
This 510(k) summary describes a device that is essentially an accessory to an MRI system (internal MR coils). The "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in this context are focused on demonstrating that the new device (Philips compatible version of existing coils) is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices, particularly regarding safety and compatibility with the new MRI system.
Here's an analysis based on the provided text:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance | Study Type |
|---|---|---|
| Possibility of excess RF heating: No excess heating, temperature change within acceptable range ( |
Ask a specific question about this device
(85 days)
INTERCEPT-URETHRAL MICROCOIL
The Intercept-Urethral Microcoil is recommended for high-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the male and female urethra and surrounding tissue. The single use, disposable coil was designed to be inserted in the urethra of the patient during MRI scans in order to obtain improved image quality in the anatomical regions surrounding the urethra including the prostate in males. The flexible coil facilitates placement of the coil in the anatomy. This product is to be used with a 1.5T GE Signa MRI machine. The signals picked up by the coil are conducted through a small coaxial cable to a connection with the standard surface coil connector for MRI systems. The coil and cable are completely sealed inside the insulating layer.
The Intercept-Urethral Microcoil (IUMC) is an intracavitary specialty coil for use in MRI imaging of the anatomical regions surrounding the urethra. The signals picked up by the coil are conducted through a small coaxial cable to a connection with the standard surface coil connector for MRI systems. The imaging coil and the coaxial cable are completely sealed inside the insulating sleeve. This device is advanced into the subject's urethra and positioned in the region of interest. The balancing and decoupling circuit is located outside the body.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Intercept-Urethral Microcoil (IUMC). It describes the device, its intended use, and the testing conducted to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness. However, it does not contain specific acceptance criteria, numeric performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC), or a detailed study description with a test set, ground truth experts, or training set information as requested in the prompt.
The document states that the imaging performance was evaluated and that "The imaging performance was evaluated in the male and female urethra. These images are shown in Exhibit 7." However, Exhibit 7 is not provided in the given text, and therefore, no quantitative performance metrics for imaging performance are available to construct the acceptance criteria table.
Based on the provided text, I can extract the following information about the studies performed, but without the specific numerical acceptance criteria or performance results:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Note: The document describes the types of tests performed and their general outcomes ("no excess heating," "no possibility of increased susceptibility," "imaging performance was evaluated," "met performance specifications"), but it does not provide specific, quantifiable acceptance criteria or numerical performance results (e.g., a specific temperature threshold, a specific imaging quality score, or mechanical specifications). Therefore, this table is based on the qualitative outcomes described.
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Reported Device Performance (Qualitative) |
|---|---|
| Excess RF Heating | No excess heating when IUMC is positioned in a phantom representative of worst-case clinical conditions. Change in temperature not significantly different than without the coil. |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation | No possibility of increased susceptibility of patients to peripheral nerve stimulation (based on current leakage calculations). |
| Imaging Performance | Evaluated in the male and female urethra (images shown in Exhibit 7, not provided). |
| Mechanical Testing | No safety issues found; all performance specifications (stiffness, tensile, tracking, torque, electrical testing) were met to satisfaction. Mechanical flexing resulted in insignificant changes in electrical properties. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Test Set Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for imaging performance. For RF heating, a "phantom that is representative of worst case clinical conditions" was used. For mechanical testing, individual components underwent testing.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated. The studies appear to be laboratory-based and phantom-based for heating and mechanical testing. Imaging performance evaluation was done on "male and female urethra," implying human subjects, but details are not provided. Origin (e.g., country) is not mentioned.
- Retrospective/Prospective: Not specified.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
- Not specified. The document does not describe a ground truth establishment process involving experts for the tests mentioned. For imaging performance, it only states that images were evaluated and shown in an exhibit.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not specified. No mention of an adjudication process.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study is not mentioned. The document describes tests related to safety (heating, nerve stimulation, mechanical) and general imaging performance, not a comparison of human readers with and without AI assistance.
6. Standalone Performance (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance)
- This is not applicable as the device described (Intercept-Urethral Microcoil) is an accessory to an MRI system designed to improve image quality, not an AI algorithm. Its "standalone" performance refers to its physical and electrical properties, not an algorithmic output.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used for the Test Set
- For RF Heating and Nerve Stimulation: Calculated values and phantom measurements, comparing with and without the coil.
- For Mechanical Testing: Performance specifications (presumably engineering standards and internal benchmarks).
- For Imaging Performance: "Evaluated in the male and female urethra" - the specific ground truth (e.g., clinical diagnosis, pathology) is not described, nor is how the "evaluation" was performed (e.g., by experts, objectively).
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not applicable. The device is a physical medical device (a coil), not a software algorithm that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not applicable, as this is a physical device and not an AI algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1