Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(146 days)
The Interacoustics EP15 ABR Stand Alone Unit is a diagnostic tool for computer-based testing. Data is collected in a Windows 95,98 database format that allows for easy inspection of results. The EP15 Stand Alone Unit produces a sound stimuly is for use in evoked response measurements or electroencephalogram activation.
The Interacoustics EP15 ABR Stand Alone Unit is a diagnostic tool for computerbased testing. Data is collected in a Windows 95,98 database format that allows for easy inspection of results. The EP15 Stand Alone Unit produces a sound stimuly is for use in evoked response measurements or electroencephalogram activation.
The provided 510(k) summary (K991853) is for the Interacoustics Model EP15 ABR Stand Alone Unit. Based on the document, this is a comparison study against a predicate device, not a study proving device performance against specific acceptance criteria in the typical sense of a new technology. The summary mainly outlines the technical specifications and functional equivalency to the predicate device, not empirical performance data from clinical trials.
Therefore, many of the requested fields regarding acceptance criteria, study sample sizes, expert involvement, and ground truth are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this type of regulatory submission. The 510(k) process for this device focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device.
However, I can extract the comparative "acceptance criteria" through the lens of technical specifications between the proposed device and its predicate.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria (as inferred from comparison to predicate) and Reported Device Performance
For this 510(k) submission, "acceptance criteria" are implicitly met by demonstrating that the proposed device, Interacoustics Model EP15 ABR, is either identical to or has equivalent or superior specifications compared to the predicate device, ICS Medical Corp. Chartr EP System, for key functional and safety aspects. The reported device performance is presented as its technical specifications.
Feature / Acceptance Criteria Category | Predicate Device (Chartr EP) | Proposed Device (EP15 ABR) | Substantial Equivalence Justification / Performance |
---|---|---|---|
Indications for Use | Same | Same | Identical |
Display Description | 15" SVGA Monitor | 12.1" Wide Angle Industrial TFT | Different size/type, but both provide necessary display. |
Software Features | Windows 95/98 Operating System | Windows 95/98 Operating System | Same operating system implies similar user interface and functionality. |
Amplifier Channels | 2 (optionally up to 8) | 2 | Equivalent baseline channels. |
Amplifier Gain | X50 - X5000000 | 80 dB | Expressed differently, but assumed to meet diagnostic needs. (Specific dB gain needs to be evaluated against voltage gain range for direct comparison, but for 510k, it's considered functionally equivalent if appropriate for ABR). |
Preamplifier Frequency Response | Same (as EP15) | 100 to 8000 Hz | Identical. |
Preamplifier CMR Ratio | >100dB at 50/60 Hz | >120dB at 50/60 Hz | EP15 ABR is superior in Common Mode Rejection. |
Preamplifier Noise |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1