Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K102584
    Date Cleared
    2011-01-14

    (128 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5570
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    IMC HYPODERMIC NEEDLE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    This device is intended for use to inject fluids into or withdraw fluids from parts of the body below the surface of the skin.

    Device Description

    This device is consist of hub, cannula and protector and has difference hub color per each of gauges.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the IMC Hypodermic Needle and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It includes performance data for a single characteristic, "Hub/needle bond strength."

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Performance CharacteristicTest MethodAcceptance CriteriaIMC Hypodermic Needle Performance
    Hub/needle bond strengthISO 7894 : 199316G-19G: >69NMeets Standard Criteria
    20G: >54NMeets Standard Criteria
    21G: >44NMeets Standard Criteria
    22G: >40NMeets Standard Criteria
    23G-24G: >34NMeets Standard Criteria
    25G-30G: >22NMeets Standard Criteria

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not specify the sample size used for testing, nor its provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective). It simply states "Meets Standard Criteria" for the IMC Hypodermic Needle performance.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not applicable as the described device is a physical medical device (hypodermic needle) and the performance data pertains to a mechanical bond strength test, not an AI or diagnostic imaging device requiring expert ground truth for interpretation.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable for the same reasons as point 3. Mechanical testing does not involve human adjudication in this context.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size

    This information is not applicable as the described device is a physical medical device, not an AI or diagnostic imaging system that would involve human readers or comparative effectiveness studies with AI assistance.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    This information is not applicable as the described device is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or AI system.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the performance data (Hub/needle bond strength) is established by objective mechanical testing against the specified force thresholds outlined in the ISO 7894:1993 standard. This is a direct physical measurement, not based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the traditional sense of diagnostic devices.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable as the device is a physical medical device and does not involve AI or machine learning that would require a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable for the same reason as point 8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1